qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 1.1] qemu-ga build fix for OpenBSD


From: Michael Roth
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 1.1] qemu-ga build fix for OpenBSD
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 22:21:25 -0500
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 10:37:09AM +0800, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 05/30/2012 09:54 AM, Michael Roth wrote:
> >On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 08:25:54PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >>On 05/29/2012 10:30 AM, Michael Roth wrote:
> >>>On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 01:52:39PM -0500, Michael Roth wrote:
> >>>>The following changes since commit 
> >>>>aeb29b6459cb9496b38c820f3faff64cf2369d0d:
> >>>>
> >>>>   audio: Always call fini on exit (2012-05-24 19:35:27 +0400)
> >>>>
> >>>>are available in the git repository at:
> >>>>   git://github.com/mdroth/qemu.git qga-pull-5-24-12
> >>>>
> >>>>Luiz Capitulino (2):
> >>>>       configure: check if environ is declared
> >>>>       qemu-ga: Fix missing environ declaration
> >>>>
> >>>>  configure            |   19 +++++++++++++++++++
> >>>>  qga/commands-posix.c |    6 +++++-
> >>>>  2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>Please ignore. There are a couple new patches in the queue that are
> >>>dependent on patches in this pull. Will send a new pull request.
> >>
> >>Too late.  I applied it last night before you sent this note.
> >>
> >>Please rebase your pull request with a patch that fixes the previous patch.
> >
> >Will rebase-resend it in a few. The PULL on the list currently just has 2
> >additional patches (1 with a dependency on this pull), so the patches
> >here are still up-to-date.
> 
> I see a 5-29-12 branch but I don't see a pull request.

It went to address@hidden but I missed qemu-devel on the
cc list =/ That pull was from before your reply and is stale now anyway though,
rebased pull request qga-pull-5-29-12-v2 is incoming.

> 
> Regards,
> 
> Anthony Liguori
> 
> >
> >>
> >>Regards,
> >>
> >>Anthony Liguori
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]