Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 08/22] linux-user: remove two unchecked uses of strdup

[Anthony Liguori]

On 05/30/2012 03:12 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > On 05/09/2012 10:12 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> > > Peter Maydell wrote:
> > > > On 9 May 2012 15:01, Jim Meyering<address@hidden>   wrote:
> > > > >    From 402100deb7e27b1d7ac619ebac963f861fae91b0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > > > From: Jim Meyering<address@hidden>
> > > > > Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 18:34:26 +0200
> > > > > Subject: [PATCH] linux-user: remove two unchecked uses of strdup
> > > > >
> > > > > Remove two uses of strdup (use g_path_get_basename instead),
> > > > > and add a comment that this strncpy use is ok.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Jim Meyering<address@hidden>
> > > >
> > > > This version
> > > > Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell<address@hidden>
> > > >
> > > > but you'll need to retransmit it (presumably as part of a v2
> > > > of this series) so it is in the proper format for a patch email
> > > > (otherwise all the conversational chatter ends up in the git
> > > > commit message).
> > >
> > > Thanks again.
> > > I'm amending to reflect ACKs and Reviewed-by: comments as they come in,
> > > as well as corrections like yours.
> > >
> > > I expect to repost the whole series (or any subset) when appropriate.
> > > Or I can push it to a publicly-accessible repository somewhere.
> >
> > Has this gotten reposted?  I don't see a new version on the list.
>
> Hi Anthony,
> I've reposted (as V2, V3, etc.) any individual patch that required revision,
> but have not reposted the series.  I would have reposted, but I recall
> someone saying that their tools managed quite well with the one-off
> reposts.

I corrected myself later as I misunderstood your question.  It handles the 
acked-bys but not partial updates to a patch series.

> Would you like me to repost just this one or the whole 22-patch series?

Could you please repost the full series?

Thanks.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori