qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] Large sized guest taking for ever to boot...


From: Jan Kiszka
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Large sized guest taking for ever to boot...
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 20:08:32 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); de; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080226 SUSE/2.0.0.12-1.1 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666

[CC'ing qemu as this discusses its code base]

On 2012-06-08 19:57, Chegu Vinod wrote:
> On 6/8/2012 10:42 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
>> On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 10:10 -0700, Chegu Vinod wrote:
>>> On 6/8/2012 9:46 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 16:29 +0000, Chegu Vinod wrote:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> I picked up a recent version of the qemu (1.0.92 with some fixes)
>>>>> and tried it
>>>>> on x86_64 server (with host and the guest running 3.4.1 kernel).
>>> BTW, I observe the same thing if i were to use 1.1.50 version of the
>>> qemu... not sure if this is really
>>> related to qemu...
>>>
>>>>> While trying to boot a large guest (80 vcpus + 512GB) I observed
>>>>> that the guest
>>>>> took for ever to boot up...  ~1 hr or even more. [This wasn't the
>>>>> case when I
>>>>> was using RHEL 6.x related bits]
>>>> Was either case using device assignment?  Device assignment will map
>>>> and
>>>> pin each page of guest memory before startup, which can be a noticeable
>>>> pause on smallish (<16GB) guests.  That should be linear scaling though
>>>> and if you're using qemu and not qemu-kvm, not related.  Thanks,
>>> I don't have any device assignment at this point . Yes I am using qemu
>>> (not qemu-kvm)...
>> Just to be safe, are you using --enable-kvm with qemu?
> 
> Yes...

Unless you are using current qemu.git master (where it is enabled by
default), --enable-kvm does not activate the in-kernel irqchip support
for you. Not sure if that can make such a huge difference, but it is a
variation from qemu-kvm. You can enable it in qemu-1.1 with -machine
kernel_irqchip=on.

> 
> -----
> 
> /etc/qemu-ifup tap0
> 
> /usr/local/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm \
> 
> -cpu
> Westmere,+rdtscp,+pdpe1gb,+dca,+pdcm,+xtpr,+tm2,+est,+smx,+vmx,+ds_cpl,+monitor,+dtes64,+pclmuldq,+pbe,+tm,+ht,+s
> 
> s,+acpi,+ds,+vme \
> -m 524288 -smp 80,sockets=80,cores=1,threads=1 \
> -name vm1 \
> -chardev
> socket,id=charmonitor,path=/var/lib/libvirt/qemu/vm1.monitor,server,nowait
> \
> -drive
> file=/dev/libvirt_lvm/vm.img,if=none,id=drive-virtio-disk0,format=raw,cache=none,aio=native
> \
> -device
> virtio-blk-pci,scsi=off,bus=pci.0,addr=0x5,drive=drive-virtio-disk0,id=virtio-disk0,bootindex=1
> \
> -monitor stdio \
> -net nic,macaddr=52:54:00:71:01:01 \
> -net tap,ifname=tap0,script=no,downscript=no \
> -vnc :4
> 
> /etc/qemu-ifdown tap0
> 
> ----
> 
>>> The issue seems very basic... 'was earlier running RHEL6.3 RC1 on the
>>> host and the guest and the host and the guest seemed to boot fine..
>> Note that RHEL is based on qemu-kvm.  Thanks,
> 
> Yep..knew that :)
> 
> I was using upstream qemu-kvm and was encouraged to move away from
> it...to qemu.

And that is good. :)

Is the problem present in current qemu-kvm.git? If yes, can you bisect
when it was introduced?

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]