qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 8/9] esp: use trace framework instead of stderr


From: Blue Swirl
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 8/9] esp: use trace framework instead of stderr output
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 19:38:16 +0000

On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 5:15 PM, Hervé Poussineau <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Hervé Poussineau <address@hidden>
> ---
>  hw/esp.c     |   13 ++++++-------
>  trace-events |    3 +++
>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/esp.c b/hw/esp.c
> index 796cdc1..ec40d93 100644
> --- a/hw/esp.c
> +++ b/hw/esp.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
>  #include "scsi.h"
>  #include "esp.h"
>  #include "trace.h"
> +#include "qemu-log.h"
>
>  /*
>  * On Sparc32, this is the ESP (NCR53C90) part of chip STP2000 (Master I/O),
> @@ -35,9 +36,6 @@
>  * 
> http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/historic-linux/early-ports/Sparc/NCR/NCR53C9X.txt
>  */
>
> -#define ESP_ERROR(fmt, ...)                                             \
> -    do { printf("ESP ERROR: %s: " fmt, __func__ , ## __VA_ARGS__); } while 
> (0)
> -
>  #define ESP_REGS 16
>  #define TI_BUFSZ 16
>
> @@ -503,7 +501,8 @@ static uint64_t esp_reg_read(ESPState *s, uint32_t saddr)
>             s->ti_size--;
>             if ((s->rregs[ESP_RSTAT] & STAT_PIO_MASK) == 0) {
>                 /* Data out.  */
> -                ESP_ERROR("PIO data read not implemented\n");
> +                qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP,
> +                              "esp: PIO data read not implemented\n");
>                 s->rregs[ESP_FIFO] = 0;
>             } else {
>                 s->rregs[ESP_FIFO] = s->ti_buf[s->ti_rptr++];
> @@ -543,7 +542,7 @@ static void esp_reg_write(ESPState *s, uint32_t saddr, 
> uint64_t val)
>         if (s->do_cmd) {
>             s->cmdbuf[s->cmdlen++] = val & 0xff;
>         } else if (s->ti_size == TI_BUFSZ - 1) {
> -            ESP_ERROR("fifo overrun\n");
> +            trace_esp_error_fifo_overrun();
>         } else {
>             s->ti_size++;
>             s->ti_buf[s->ti_wptr++] = val & 0xff;
> @@ -631,7 +630,7 @@ static void esp_reg_write(ESPState *s, uint32_t saddr, 
> uint64_t val)
>             esp_raise_irq(s);
>             break;
>         default:
> -            ESP_ERROR("Unhandled ESP command (%2.2x)\n", (unsigned)val);
> +            trace_esp_error_unhandled_command(val);

This should also become LOG_UNIMP.

>             break;
>         }
>         break;
> @@ -646,7 +645,7 @@ static void esp_reg_write(ESPState *s, uint32_t saddr, 
> uint64_t val)
>         s->rregs[saddr] = val;
>         break;
>     default:
> -        ESP_ERROR("invalid write of 0x%02x at [0x%x]\n", (unsigned)val, 
> saddr);
> +        trace_esp_error_invalid_write(val, saddr);
>         return;
>     }
>     s->wregs[saddr] = val;
> diff --git a/trace-events b/trace-events
> index 9b2e717..fa13aed 100644
> --- a/trace-events
> +++ b/trace-events
> @@ -644,6 +644,9 @@ iscsi_aio_read16_cb(void *iscsi, int status, void *acb, 
> int canceled) "iscsi %p
>  iscsi_aio_readv(void *iscsi, int64_t sector_num, int nb_sectors, void 
> *opaque, void *acb) "iscsi %p sector_num %"PRId64" nb_sectors %d opaque %p 
> acb %p"
>
>  # hw/esp.c
> +esp_error_fifo_overrun(void) "FIFO overrun"
> +esp_error_unhandled_command(uint32_t val) "unhandled command (%2.2x)"
> +esp_error_invalid_write(uint32_t val, uint32_t addr) "invalid write of 
> 0x%02x at [0x%x]"
>  esp_raise_irq(void) "Raise IRQ"
>  esp_lower_irq(void) "Lower IRQ"
>  esp_dma_enable(void) "Raise enable"
> --
> 1.7.10
>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]