Am 02.07.2012 19:33, schrieb Eric Blake:
On 07/02/2012 04:16 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
Hi
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
Can we discuss the future of 'getfd', the possibility of 'pass-fd', or
even the enhancement of all existing monitor commands to take an
optional 'nfds' JSON argument for atomic management of fd passing?
Which commands need to reopen a file with different access, and do we
bite the bullet to special case all of those commands to allow fd
passing or can we make qemu_open() coupled with high-level fd passing
generic enough to satisfy all of our reopen needs?
Sure we can, at least if Corey will attend the call. Otherwise I guess
it's better to keep the discussion on the mailing list.
Kevin