Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4] bitops.h: Add functions to extract and deposit bitfields

[Stefan Weil]

Am 08.07.2012 12:01, schrieb Peter Maydell:
> On 8 July 2012 10:55, Lluís Vilanova <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Wouldn't it be better to use "unsigned int" instead on all the "start" and
> > "length" arguments?
> See the arguments about this on one of the previous patch series:
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2012-06/msg04304.html
>
> -- PMM

I just read that arguments and now agree with Blue and with
Lluís that 'unsigned' would be better.

Cheers,

Stefan W.