qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] vfio-powerpc: added VFIO support


From: Alexey Kardashevskiy
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] vfio-powerpc: added VFIO support
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 10:17:50 +1000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1

On 11/07/12 10:04, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 09:55 +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> On 11/07/12 08:26, Scott Wood wrote:
>>> On 07/10/2012 12:51 AM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>>> The patch enables VFIO on POWER.
>>>>
>>>> It literally does the following:
>>>>
>>>> 1. POWERPC IOMMU support (the kernel counterpart is required)
>>> [snip]
>>>> +/* -------- API for POWERPC IOMMU -------- */
>>>> +
>>>> +#define POWERPC_IOMMU           2
>>>> +
>>>> +struct tce_iommu_info {
>>>> +    __u32 argsz;
>>>> +    __u32 dma32_window_start;
>>>> +    __u32 dma32_window_size;
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +#define POWERPC_IOMMU_GET_INFO _IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 12)
>>>
>>> Is there a more specific name that could be used for this?  Not all
>>> PowerPC chips have the same kind of IOMMU.
> 
>>
>> Ben, is is SPAPR? BOOK3S?
> 
> So we have varieties of different iommus in the kernel indeed, we
> probably want the info ioctl to reflect that. I would call this one
> spapr_tce.

VFIO provides such ioctl actually and it is it who returns POWERPC_IOMMU as an 
IOMMU type.

ok. SPAPR_TCE.


> Also we will want a few other things, dunno if that's reflected here,
> or whether the ioctl is easily extendable, but in the long run we will
> need:
> 
>  - Ways to tell KVM about association between a liobn (logical bus
> number as used in H_PUT_TCE) and an iommu so we can implement the real
> mode H_PUT_TCE properly.
> 
>  - We will need some conduit to implement the "DDW" APIs (part of PAPR
> allowing the guest to control the DMA windows, ie, by creating new
> windows in 64-bit DMA space, with different page sizes etc....). So you
> may want to make it clear that the above provides information about the
> "base window" specifically.

So the current one would be SPAPR_TCE_32?


-- 
Alexey





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]