[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] msi/msix: added API to set MSI message address
From: |
Alexander Graf |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] msi/msix: added API to set MSI message address and data |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Jul 2012 20:22:05 +0200 |
On 06.07.2012, at 17:58, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-07-06 17:36, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>> On 02.07.2012, at 09:24, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>
>>> On 2012-07-02 06:28, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>>> Ping?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 22/06/12 11:15, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>>>> Added (msi|msix)_set_message() function for whoever might
>>>>> want to use them.
>>>>>
>>>>> Currently msi_notify()/msix_notify() write to these vectors to
>>>>> signal the guest about an interrupt so the correct values have to
>>>>> written there by the guest or QEMU.
>>>>>
>>>>> For example, POWER guest never initializes MSI/MSIX vectors, instead
>>>>> it uses RTAS hypercalls. So in order to support MSIX for virtio-pci on
>>>>> POWER we have to initialize MSI/MSIX message from QEMU.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <address@hidden>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> hw/msi.c | 13 +++++++++++++
>>>>> hw/msi.h | 1 +
>>>>> hw/msix.c | 9 +++++++++
>>>>> hw/msix.h | 2 ++
>>>>> 4 files changed, 25 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/hw/msi.c b/hw/msi.c
>>>>> index 5233204..cc6102f 100644
>>>>> --- a/hw/msi.c
>>>>> +++ b/hw/msi.c
>>>>> @@ -105,6 +105,19 @@ static inline uint8_t msi_pending_off(const
>>>>> PCIDevice* dev, bool msi64bit)
>>>>> return dev->msi_cap + (msi64bit ? PCI_MSI_PENDING_64 :
>>>>> PCI_MSI_PENDING_32);
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> +void msi_set_message(PCIDevice *dev, MSIMessage msg)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + uint16_t flags = pci_get_word(dev->config + msi_flags_off(dev));
>>>>> + bool msi64bit = flags & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_64BIT;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (msi64bit) {
>>>>> + pci_set_quad(dev->config + msi_address_lo_off(dev), msg.address);
>>>>> + } else {
>>>>> + pci_set_long(dev->config + msi_address_lo_off(dev), msg.address);
>>>>> + }
>>>>> + pci_set_word(dev->config + msi_data_off(dev, msi64bit), msg.data);
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> bool msi_enabled(const PCIDevice *dev)
>>>>> {
>>>>> return msi_present(dev) &&
>>>>> diff --git a/hw/msi.h b/hw/msi.h
>>>>> index 75747ab..6ec1f99 100644
>>>>> --- a/hw/msi.h
>>>>> +++ b/hw/msi.h
>>>>> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ struct MSIMessage {
>>>>>
>>>>> extern bool msi_supported;
>>>>>
>>>>> +void msi_set_message(PCIDevice *dev, MSIMessage msg);
>>>>> bool msi_enabled(const PCIDevice *dev);
>>>>> int msi_init(struct PCIDevice *dev, uint8_t offset,
>>>>> unsigned int nr_vectors, bool msi64bit, bool
>>>>> msi_per_vector_mask);
>>>>> diff --git a/hw/msix.c b/hw/msix.c
>>>>> index ded3c55..5f7d6d3 100644
>>>>> --- a/hw/msix.c
>>>>> +++ b/hw/msix.c
>>>>> @@ -45,6 +45,15 @@ static MSIMessage msix_get_message(PCIDevice *dev,
>>>>> unsigned vector)
>>>>> return msg;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> +void msix_set_message(PCIDevice *dev, int vector, struct MSIMessage msg)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + uint8_t *table_entry = dev->msix_table_page + vector *
>>>>> PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_SIZE;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + pci_set_quad(table_entry + PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_LOWER_ADDR, msg.address);
>>>>> + pci_set_long(table_entry + PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_DATA, msg.data);
>>>>> + table_entry[PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_VECTOR_CTRL] &=
>>>>> ~PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_CTRL_MASKBIT;
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> /* Add MSI-X capability to the config space for the device. */
>>>>> /* Given a bar and its size, add MSI-X table on top of it
>>>>> * and fill MSI-X capability in the config space.
>>>>> diff --git a/hw/msix.h b/hw/msix.h
>>>>> index 50aee82..26a437e 100644
>>>>> --- a/hw/msix.h
>>>>> +++ b/hw/msix.h
>>>>> @@ -4,6 +4,8 @@
>>>>> #include "qemu-common.h"
>>>>> #include "pci.h"
>>>>>
>>>>> +void msix_set_message(PCIDevice *dev, int vector, MSIMessage msg);
>>>>> +
>>>>> int msix_init(PCIDevice *pdev, unsigned short nentries,
>>>>> MemoryRegion *bar,
>>>>> unsigned bar_nr, unsigned bar_size);
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Jan Kiszka <address@hidden>
>>
>> So I take it that you expect this patch to go through my tree, not yours?
>
> I suppose you wanted to address Michael, right? He has to decide.
Michael?
Alex
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] msi/msix: added API to set MSI message address and data, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2012/07/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] msi/msix: added API to set MSI message address and data, Alexey Kardashevskiy, 2012/07/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] msi/msix: added API to set MSI message address and data, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2012/07/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] msi/msix: added API to set MSI message address and data, Alexey Kardashevskiy, 2012/07/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] msi/msix: added API to set MSI message address and data, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2012/07/19
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] msi/msix: added API to set MSI message address and data, Alexey Kardashevskiy, 2012/07/19
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] msi/msix: added API to set MSI message address and data, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2012/07/19
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] msi/msix: added API to set MSI message address and data, Alexey Kardashevskiy, 2012/07/19
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] msi/msix: added API to set MSI message address and data, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2012/07/19
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] msi/msix: added API to set MSI message address and data, Alexey Kardashevskiy, 2012/07/18