qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL] pci,msi,virtio


From: Alex Williamson
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL] pci,msi,virtio
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 11:05:25 -0600

On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 11:39 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Andreas Färber <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > Am 19.07.2012 17:15, schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
> >> The following changes since commit 
> >> 80aa796bf38b7ef21daa42673b4711510c450d8a:
> >> 
> >>   pci_bridge_dev: fix error path in pci_bridge_dev_initfn() (2012-06-11 
> >> 22:55:13 +0300)
> >> 
> >> are available in the git repository at:
> >> 
> >>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/mst/qemu.git tags/for_anthony
> >> 
> >> for you to fetch changes up to 932d4a42afa28829fadf3cbfbb0507cc09aafd8b:
> >> 
> >>   msi/msix: added API to set MSI message address and data (2012-07-19 
> >> 17:56:42 +0300)
> >> 
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> >> pci,msi,virtio
> >> 
> >> This pull includes preparation patches mostly by Jan and Alex
> >> that should help merge device assignment down the road.
> >> And there's a new API needed for emulating POWER firmware.
> >> 
> >> So no new functionality and some unused APIs but it looks like
> >> merging will help people make progress.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden>
> >
> > Usually, PULLs are expected to carry the individual patches as replies.
> >
> > But more important, did something go wrong with rebasing before sending
> > out the PULL? June 11 is more than a month ago. And if I try to rebase
> > my pci_host branch on your "pci" branch it tries to replay loads of
> > really old post-1.1 commits (e.g., my "Pass PowerPCCPU to...") and
> > fails... am I doing something wrong? "for_anthony" tag and "pci" branch
> > seem to match in date at least.
> 
> 
> It's a tag, not a branch.
> 
> I had to add an explicit remote to pull tags in.  I'm not sure if
> there's a better way to do it in git.

Looks like it merged ok for me, but you'll need this to complete the
PCIUnregisterFunc conversion.  Not sure how this built in MST's tree.
Anthony, it'd be great if we could merge and fix this in your tree since
MST is out of the office.  Thanks,

Alex

commit 34e37573f1a983dab43673d664eb500bc87a46d4
Author: Alex Williamson <address@hidden>
Date:   Mon Jul 23 10:59:43 2012 -0600

    esp: Update PCIUnregisterFunc function
    
    Function prototype changed in f90c2bcd
    
    Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <address@hidden>

diff --git a/hw/esp.c b/hw/esp.c
index c6422ad..a011347 100644
--- a/hw/esp.c
+++ b/hw/esp.c
@@ -1153,13 +1153,11 @@ static int esp_pci_scsi_init(PCIDevice *dev)
     return 0;
 }
 
-static int esp_pci_scsi_uninit(PCIDevice *d)
+static void esp_pci_scsi_uninit(PCIDevice *d)
 {
     PCIESPState *pci = DO_UPCAST(PCIESPState, dev, d);
 
     memory_region_destroy(&pci->io);
-
-    return 0;
 }
 
 static void esp_pci_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]