[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] Cirrus bugs vs endian: how two bugs cancel each other o
From: |
Benjamin Herrenschmidt |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] Cirrus bugs vs endian: how two bugs cancel each other out |
Date: |
Tue, 07 Aug 2012 07:16:08 +1000 |
On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 15:20 +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> There are discussions about re-doing the guest/host interface (command
> rings etc) now and then, by adding a qxl2 device (or maybe even extend
> stdvga), dropping a bunch of backward compatibility stuff in qxl.c.
>
> Sending the spice commands over virtio is certainly an option here.
> I'm
> not sure it is possible to drive virtio rings from userspace (Xorg
> driver), but that issue should go away with the qxl kms driver in the
> works.
Anything that gets rid of the qxl memory region API is welcome ;-) Some
of that stuff is really gross.
Ben.
Re: [Qemu-devel] Cirrus bugs vs endian: how two bugs cancel each other out, Gerd Hoffmann, 2012/08/06
Re: [Qemu-devel] Cirrus bugs vs endian: how two bugs cancel each other out, Gerd Hoffmann, 2012/08/06