qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] eventfd: making it thread safe


From: David Gibson
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] eventfd: making it thread safe
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 14:02:03 +1000
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 05:05:57PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 08/01/2012 07:05 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> > From: Alexey Kardashevskiy <address@hidden>
> > 
> > QEMU uses IO handlers to run select() in the main loop.
> > The handlers list is managed by qemu_set_fd_handler() helper
> > which works fine when called from the main thread as it is
> > called when select() is not waiting.
> > 
> > However IO handlers list can be changed in the thread other than
> > the main one doing os_host_main_loop_wait(), for example, as a result
> > of a hypercall which changes PCI config space (VFIO on POWER is the case)
> > and enables/disabled MSI/MSIX which creates eventfd handles.
> > As the main loop should be waiting on the newly created eventfds,
> > it has to be restarted.
> > 
> > The patch adds the qemu_notify_event() call to interrupt select()
> > to make main_loop() restart select() with the updated IO handlers
> > list.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <address@hidden>
> > Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>
> > ---
> >  iohandler.c |    1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/iohandler.c b/iohandler.c
> > index 3c74de6..dea4355 100644
> > --- a/iohandler.c
> > +++ b/iohandler.c
> > @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ int qemu_set_fd_handler2(int fd,
> >          ioh->fd_write = fd_write;
> >          ioh->opaque = opaque;
> >          ioh->deleted = 0;
> > +        qemu_notify_event();
> >      }
> >      return 0;
> >  }
> 
> Perhaps it's better to do this unconditionally (on the delete path too)
> so that removals are processed without delay and we don't have closed
> fds hanging around in select().

Well, I understand that Alexey discussed the patch with Paolo and
Michael Tsirkin, and this was the preferred approach for now.  Since
obviously no events will happen on deleted fds, removing them from the
select() is not really urgent.

This is a very straightforward fix for a real problem, can we please
just merge the damn thing.

-- 
David Gibson                    | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
                                | _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]