[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] virtio-scsi vs. virtio-blk
From: |
Stefan Priebe |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] virtio-scsi vs. virtio-blk |
Date: |
Wed, 8 Aug 2012 19:12:42 +0200 |
Yes cache none. Is there a bugfix for 1.1.1?
Stefan
Am 08.08.2012 um 18:17 schrieb Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>:
> Il 08/08/2012 17:21, Stefan Priebe ha scritto:
>> Hello list,
>>
>> i wanted to start using virtio-scsi instead of virtio-blk, cause it
>> offers the possibility to use discard / trim support.
>>
>> Kernel: 3.5.0 on host and guest
>> Qemu-kvm: 1.1.1 stable
>>
>> But i'm not seeing the same or nearly the same speed:
>
> 1) How did you start the guest? Did you use cache=none?
>
> 2) Please try the latest qemu-kvm release. 1.1 didn't use ioeventfd for
> virtio-scsi by mistake.
>
> Paolo
- [Qemu-devel] virtio-scsi vs. virtio-blk, Stefan Priebe, 2012/08/08
- Re: [Qemu-devel] virtio-scsi vs. virtio-blk, Paolo Bonzini, 2012/08/08
- Re: [Qemu-devel] virtio-scsi vs. virtio-blk,
Stefan Priebe <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] virtio-scsi vs. virtio-blk, Stefan Priebe, 2012/08/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] virtio-scsi vs. virtio-blk, Paolo Bonzini, 2012/08/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] virtio-scsi vs. virtio-blk, Stefan Priebe, 2012/08/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] virtio-scsi vs. virtio-blk, Paolo Bonzini, 2012/08/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] virtio-scsi vs. virtio-blk, Stefan Priebe, 2012/08/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] virtio-scsi vs. virtio-blk, Paolo Bonzini, 2012/08/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] virtio-scsi vs. virtio-blk, Stefan Priebe, 2012/08/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] virtio-scsi vs. virtio-blk, Paolo Bonzini, 2012/08/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] virtio-scsi vs. virtio-blk, Stefan Hajnoczi, 2012/08/09