Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH v4 3/3] tcg: Optimize qemu_ld/st by generating slow paths at the end of a block

[Andreas Färber]

Am 27.08.2012 20:31, schrieb Peter Maydell:
> On 27 August 2012 08:23, Yeongkyoon Lee <address@hidden> wrote:
>> BTW, who will finally confirm my patches?
>> I have sent four version of my patches in which I have applied all the
>> reasonable feedbacks from this community.
> 
> If you'd like your patches committed you should not use the "[RFC]" tag
> in the Subject, because "RFC" means "I would like feedback on this
> patch but do not intend it to be committed to master".

Literally, RFC means request for comments.

Personally I differentiate between [RFC n/m] and [PATCH RFC n/m], where
the lack of PATCH means "don't commit this version" and the latter
indicating "I'm not so sure if this is how we want to do it, but if
people agree it can go in". ;)

Not sure how [RFC][PATCH n/m] is intended here? If everyone adds RFC to
a regular PATCH, it looses meaning. In the course of review when you
feel the patches are okay to be committed, RFC should disappear as you
may well get comments without asking for them anyway. :)

HTE,
Andreas

-- 
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg