Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for Tuesda, August 28th

[Eduardo Habkost]

On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 07:59:47PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 28.08.2012 16:27, schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
> > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 02:55:56PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> On 28 August 2012 14:30, Eduardo Habkost <address@hidden> wrote:
> >>> - 1.2 branching, or creation of a "cpu-next" tree where "good to be
> >>>   merged" patches can live until 1.2 is done;
> >>
> >> With 1.3 due for release in just over a week, it seems unlikely
> >> that it's worth branching at this point...
> > 
> > Well, the closer to the release, the smaller the cost of branching as we
> > won't have many patches entering the 1.2 branch, anyway.
> 
> The idea behind the new release model is to never branch for releases,
> so that we can easily bisect between v1.2 and v1.3, both tags being on
> the same branch. So I don't think a 1.2 branch is likely.

That means that every branch to be merged after 1.2 has to be rebased on
top of 1.2 before being merged?

-- 
Eduardo