[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] boot device order has no effect for virtio-scsi devices
From: |
Paolo Bonzini |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] boot device order has no effect for virtio-scsi devices |
Date: |
Wed, 05 Sep 2012 08:55:57 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120717 Thunderbird/14.0 |
Il 05/09/2012 00:13, ching ha scritto:
>>>> >>> Ah, ok. libvirt for now supports only booting from LUN 0. You can use
^^^^^^^
Oops, should have been SeaBIOS.
>>>> >>> multiple targets instead of multiple units.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Paolo
>>>> >>>
>>> >> it works. thanks a lot.
>>> >> hope that libvirt will document it somewhere
>> > Please raise this issue on the libvirt lists, then.
>> >
> actually, why is the problem related to libvirt, not qemu, nor seabios?
>
> libvirt has generated the qemu command line with "bootindex" already.
Yes, it's SeaBIOS. It is documented in the code.
Paolo
- Re: [Qemu-devel] boot device order has no effect for virtio-scsi devices, ching, 2012/09/02
- Re: [Qemu-devel] boot device order has no effect for virtio-scsi devices, Paolo Bonzini, 2012/09/03
- Re: [Qemu-devel] boot device order has no effect for virtio-scsi devices, ching, 2012/09/03
- Re: [Qemu-devel] boot device order has no effect for virtio-scsi devices, Paolo Bonzini, 2012/09/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] boot device order has no effect for virtio-scsi devices, ching, 2012/09/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] boot device order has no effect for virtio-scsi devices, Eric Blake, 2012/09/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] boot device order has no effect for virtio-scsi devices, ching, 2012/09/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] boot device order has no effect for virtio-scsi devices,
Paolo Bonzini <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] boot device order has no effect for virtio-scsi devices, ching, 2012/09/05