Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] kvm: i386: Add classic PCI device assignment

[Avi Kivity]

On 09/05/2012 12:00 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>
>> Why? The way this is being submitted I don't see why we should treat
>> Jan's patch any different from a patch by IBM or Samsung where we've
>> asked folks to fix the license to comply with what I thought was our new
>> policy (it does not even contain a from-x-on-GPLv2+ notice).
> 
> Asking is one thing.  Requiring is another.
> 
> I would prefer that people submitted GPLv2+, but I don't think it should
> be a hard requirement.  It means, among other things, that we cannot
> accept most code that originates from the Linux kernel.

We could extend this to "require unless there is a reason to grant an
exception" if we wanted to (not saying I know whether we want to or not).


-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function