Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] kvm: i386: Add classic PCI device assignment

[Michael S. Tsirkin]

On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 06:26:54PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 09/05/2012 12:00 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >>
> >> Why? The way this is being submitted I don't see why we should treat
> >> Jan's patch any different from a patch by IBM or Samsung where we've
> >> asked folks to fix the license to comply with what I thought was our new
> >> policy (it does not even contain a from-x-on-GPLv2+ notice).
> > 
> > Asking is one thing.  Requiring is another.
> > 
> > I would prefer that people submitted GPLv2+, but I don't think it should
> > be a hard requirement.  It means, among other things, that we cannot
> > accept most code that originates from the Linux kernel.
> 
> We could extend this to "require unless there is a reason to grant an
> exception" if we wanted to (not saying I know whether we want to or not).

Would be nice to add a clarification in the header: people
tend to copy boilerplate around.

> 
> -- 
> error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function