qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Added more entries to the LEON processor config


From: Ronald Hecht
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Added more entries to the LEON processor configuration register
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 09:15:36 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20120724 Icedove/3.0.11

On 09/19/2012 08:56 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
--- a/target-sparc/translate.c
+++ b/target-sparc/translate.c
@@ -2590,13 +2590,9 @@ static void disas_sparc_insn(DisasContext * dc, unsigned 
int insn)
                                         microSPARC II */
                      /* Read Asr17 */
                      if (rs1 == 0x11&&  dc->def->features&  CPU_FEATURE_ASR17) 
{
-                        TCGv r_const;
-
-                        /* Read Asr17 for a Leon3 monoprocessor */
-                        r_const = tcg_const_tl((1<<  8)
-                                               | (dc->def->nwindows - 1));
-                        gen_movl_TN_reg(rd, r_const);
-                        tcg_temp_free(r_const);
+                        /* Read Asr17 on LEON3 */
+                        gen_helper_rdasr17(cpu_dst, cpu_env);
Is the register is read very often? If it is, we could avoid the
helper call by performing the load of env->cpu_index, the shift and OR
with the above constant with TCG ops. The arithmetic could be even
avoided completely by storing precalculated values in cpu_index, then
other accesses to cpu_index need to shift right by 28 to read the
index (depends on balance of other cpu_index uses vs. this
instruction).

The register is read quite often, but not as often as the PSR. It is normally read when entering the OS (Linux, PikeOS ...) Kernel to know on which CPU we are running a thread. But polluting the cpu_index in env sounds a bit strange and overkill to me. Do you really mean the cpu_index in the structure CPUSPARCState? Or could we place it in dc->def as a constant?

Best regards,
Ronald



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]