[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM Call minutes for 2012-09-25
From: |
Luiz Capitulino |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM Call minutes for 2012-09-25 |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Sep 2012 15:52:09 -0300 |
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 16:59:00 +0200
Markus Armbruster <address@hidden> wrote:
> Juan Quintela <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > This are this week minutes:
> >
> > - URI parsing library for glusterfs: libxml2 vs. in-tree "fork" of the
> > same code. (Paolo)
> > * code hasn't changed in 2 years, it is really stable
> > * anthony wants to copy the code
> >
> > - there are several commands that do blocking IO
> > dump-guest-memory/screen-dump
> > convert to asynchronous commands after we move all to QAPI
> > only two commands missingto port to QAPI, and one is posted on list
> > non-blocking IO to a file is a challenge
> > (we have code on the block layer for it)
> >
> > - how to give errors from OpenFile to the caller
> > putting errno as int: bad idea
> > putting as strerrno string: also a bad idea, no warantees
>
> Use the identifiers instead of their non-portable numeric encodings or
> strerror() descriptions: "EPERM", "EINVAL", ...
Yes, but for me the important point in this discussion is whether
or not a new class is necessary. I think it it isn't.