qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V19 3/7] Add a debug register


From: Corey Bryant
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V19 3/7] Add a debug register
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 10:23:58 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120828 Thunderbird/15.0



On 06/04/2012 03:37 PM, Stefan Berger wrote:
This patch uses the possibility to add a vendor-specific register and
adds a debug register useful for dumping the TIS's internal state. This
register is only active in a debug build (#define DEBUG_TIS).

Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <address@hidden>
---
  hw/tpm_tis.c |   70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  1 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/tpm_tis.c b/hw/tpm_tis.c
index 02b9c2e..5f8899d 100644
--- a/hw/tpm_tis.c
+++ b/hw/tpm_tis.c
@@ -52,6 +52,9 @@
  #define TPM_TIS_REG_DID_VID               0xf00
  #define TPM_TIS_REG_RID                   0xf04

+/* vendor-specific registers */
+#define TPM_TIS_REG_DEBUG                 0xf90
+
  #define TPM_TIS_STS_VALID                 (1 << 7)
  #define TPM_TIS_STS_COMMAND_READY         (1 << 6)
  #define TPM_TIS_STS_TPM_GO                (1 << 5)
@@ -97,6 +100,11 @@

  #define TPM_TIS_NO_DATA_BYTE  0xff

+/* local prototypes */
+
+static uint64_t tpm_tis_mmio_read(void *opaque, target_phys_addr_t addr,
+                                  unsigned size);
+
  /* utility functions */

  static uint8_t tpm_tis_locality_from_addr(target_phys_addr_t addr)
@@ -331,6 +339,63 @@ static uint32_t tpm_tis_data_read(TPMState *s, uint8_t 
locty)
      return ret;
  }

+#ifdef DEBUG_TIS
+static void tpm_tis_dump_state(void *opaque, target_phys_addr_t addr)
+{
+    static const unsigned regs[] = {
+        TPM_TIS_REG_ACCESS,
+        TPM_TIS_REG_INT_ENABLE,
+        TPM_TIS_REG_INT_VECTOR,
+        TPM_TIS_REG_INT_STATUS,
+        TPM_TIS_REG_INTF_CAPABILITY,
+        TPM_TIS_REG_STS,
+        TPM_TIS_REG_DID_VID,
+        TPM_TIS_REG_RID,
+        0xfff};
+    int idx;
+    uint8_t locty = tpm_tis_locality_from_addr(addr);
+    target_phys_addr_t base = addr & ~0xfff;
+    TPMState *s = opaque;
+    TPMTISState *tis = &s->s.tis;
+
+    dprintf("tpm_tis: active locality      : %d\n"
+            "tpm_tis: state of locality %d : %d\n"
+            "tpm_tis: register dump:\n",
+            tis->active_locty,
+            locty, tis->loc[locty].status);
+
+    for (idx = 0; regs[idx] != 0xfff; idx++) {
+        dprintf("tpm_tis: 0x%04x : 0x%08x\n", regs[idx],
+                (uint32_t)tpm_tis_mmio_read(opaque, base + regs[idx], 4));
+    }
+
+    dprintf("tpm_tis: read offset   : %d\n"
+            "tpm_tis: result buffer : ",
+            tis->loc[locty].r_offset);
+    for (idx = 0;
+         idx < tpm_tis_get_size_from_buffer(&tis->loc[locty].r_buffer);
+         idx++) {
+        dprintf("%c%02x%s",
+                tis->loc[locty].r_offset == idx ? '>' : ' ',
+                tis->loc[locty].r_buffer.buffer[idx],
+                ((idx & 0xf) == 0xf) ? "\ntpm_tis:                 " : "");
+    }
+    dprintf("\n"
+            "tpm_tis: write offset  : %d\n"
+            "tpm_tis: request buffer: ",
+            tis->loc[locty].w_offset);
+    for (idx = 0;
+         idx < tpm_tis_get_size_from_buffer(&tis->loc[locty].w_buffer);
+         idx++) {
+        dprintf("%c%02x%s",
+                tis->loc[locty].w_offset == idx ? '>' : ' ',
+                tis->loc[locty].w_buffer.buffer[idx],
+                ((idx & 0xf) == 0xf) ? "\ntpm_tis:                 " : "");
+    }
+    dprintf("\n");
+}
+#endif
+
  /*
   * Read a register of the TIS interface
   * See specs pages 33-63 for description of the registers
@@ -400,6 +465,11 @@ static uint64_t tpm_tis_mmio_read(void *opaque, 
target_phys_addr_t addr,
      case TPM_TIS_REG_RID:
          val = TPM_TIS_TPM_RID;
          break;
+#ifdef DEBUG_TIS
+    case TPM_TIS_REG_DEBUG:
+        tpm_tis_dump_state(opaque, addr);
+        break;
+#endif
      }

      if (shift) {


This patch looks okay to me.

--
Regards,
Corey Bryant




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]