Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch 2/6] Use machine options to emulate -no-kvm-irqchip

[Marcelo Tosatti]

On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 07:24:48PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-10-03 19:16, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > Jan Kiszka <address@hidden> writes:
> > 
> >> On 2012-10-03 17:03, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 09:40:17AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >>>> Marcelo Tosatti <address@hidden> writes:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Commit 3ad763fcba5bd0ec5a79d4a9b6baeef119dd4a3d from qemu-kvm.git.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> From: Jan Kiszka <address@hidden>
> >>>>>     
> >>>>> Upstream is moving towards this mechanism, so start using it in qemu-kvm
> >>>>> already to configure the specific defaults: kvm enabled on, just like
> >>>>> in-kernel irqchips.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <address@hidden>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Reviewed-by: Anthony Liguori <address@hidden>
> >>>>
> >>>> Although it's a little odd to have From: Jan without a SoB...
> >>>
> >>> Agree, Jan can you ACK?
> >>
> >> I wasn't able to join the call yesterday: Is there a removal schedule
> >> associated with those switches? Also, why pushing things upstream, even
> >> when only for one release, that have been loudly deprecated for a while
> >> in qemu-kvm? Some switches are lacking deprecated warnings on the
> >> console, and -no-kvm is missing completely. I tend to focus on patch 1 &
> >> 5, dropping the rest - based on relevance for production use.
> > 
> > The distros need to keep these flags to do the switch.
> 
> Why? Should be documented in commit log.
> 
> >  I see no point
> > in deprecating them since they're trivially easy to maintain.
> 
> Given the level of cr** we already have in the command line, they are
> kind of noise, yes. But even then, these patches are not consistent as
> pointed out above.
> 
> Also, they should not be documented to avoid being spread. That's what
> we did with other deprecated switches in QEMU.
> 
> Jan

Jan,

You're comments to the patch are:

- No documentation.
- Expiration date.
- Changelog explaining what?? (didnt get that). Perhaps better changelog
  in general?

Please help me understand.