qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 18/22] target-i386: parse cpu_model string into


From: Igor Mammedov
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 18/22] target-i386: parse cpu_model string into set of stringified properties
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 22:17:59 +0200

On Wed, 3 Oct 2012 20:09:52 +0000
Blue Swirl <address@hidden> wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Eric Blake <address@hidden> wrote:
> > On 09/30/2012 06:16 AM, Blue Swirl wrote:
> >> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 8:32 PM, Igor Mammedov <address@hidden> wrote:
> >>> cpu_model string does represent features in following format:
> >>>  ([+-]feat)|(feat=foo)|(feat)
> >>> which makes it impossible directly use property infrastructure
> >>> to set features on CPU.
> >>> This patch introduces parser that splits CPU name from cpu_model and
> >>> converts legacy features string into canonized set of strings that
> >>> is compatible with property manipulation infrastructure.
> >>>
> >
> >>> +
> >>> +    *cpu_name = strtok_r(s, ",", &sptr);
> >>
> >> This would break build since strtok_r() isn't available on Mingw, it's
> >
> > Correct.  Microsoft is stuck in the past when it comes to standard
> > conformance.
> >
> >> not Posix either.
> >
> > Huh? http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/strtok_r.html
> > strtok_r has been part of POSIX since pthreads were added.
> 
> Sorry, I missed that strtok_r() was sharing the entry with strtok().
Mingw maintainers rejected to implement it though:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2673480&group_id=2435&atid=352435

Anyway, I've already replace it with g_strsplit(), resulting patch became even
simpler.

> 
> >
> > --
> > Eric Blake   address@hidden    +1-919-301-3266
> > Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
> >


-- 
Regards,
  Igor



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]