qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-arm/translate: Fix RRX operands


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-arm/translate: Fix RRX operands
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 17:43:55 +0100

On 16 October 2012 10:15, Peter Crosthwaite
<address@hidden> wrote:
> Instructions that both use the RRX second operand and update CS were
> incorrect, as the Carry flag was updated too early. An example of such an
> instruction would be:
>
> ands r12,r13,RRX
>
> Ands, because of the "s" flag will update the carry flag. But the RRX second
> operand rotates through the C flag which should happen before the update.
> Fixed the ordering of the two, the old carry is read by "r13,RRX" before being
> updated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Crosthwaite <address@hidden>
> Reported-by: Vinesh Peringat <address@hidden>
> ---
>  target-arm/translate.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target-arm/translate.c b/target-arm/translate.c
> index c6840b7..daccb15 100644
> --- a/target-arm/translate.c
> +++ b/target-arm/translate.c
> @@ -516,10 +516,10 @@ static inline void gen_arm_shift_im(TCGv var, int 
> shiftop, int shift, int flags)
>              tcg_gen_rotri_i32(var, var, shift); break;
>          } else {
>              TCGv tmp = tcg_temp_new_i32();
> +            tcg_gen_shli_i32(tmp, cpu_CF, 31);
>              if (flags)
>                  shifter_out_im(var, 0);
>              tcg_gen_shri_i32(var, var, 1);
> -            tcg_gen_shli_i32(tmp, cpu_CF, 31);
>              tcg_gen_or_i32(var, var, tmp);
>              tcg_temp_free_i32(tmp);
>          }

Looks like this was broken by Aurelien's commit 66c374de8; previously
we loaded CF into a tmp before doing the shifter_out_im() [which updates CF],
and then used the tmp after the call, rather than directly using CF.

Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <address@hidden>

-- PMM



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]