qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 20/27] target-i386: do not call x86_cpu_realize(


From: Andreas Färber
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 20/27] target-i386: do not call x86_cpu_realize() on cpu_x86_init()
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:43:48 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121025 Thunderbird/16.0.2

Am 31.10.2012 17:32, schrieb Igor Mammedov:
> On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 15:49:54 -0200
> Eduardo Habkost <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
>> The PC code will need to run additional steps when initializing the CPU
>> object, before x86_cpu_realize(). So, make cpu_x86_init() not call
> Killing cpu_x86_init() altogether will make future re-factoring even easier.
> For present its code could be duplicated in cpu_init() and pc.c,
> 
> and with cpu subclasses cpu_init () would be reduced to
>   cpu = object_new(X86CPU.QEMUxx);
>   cpu.realize();
> and pc_cpus_init()
>   cpu = object_new(X86CPU.QEMUxx);
>   make cpu a child of /machine ();
>   apply custom properties ();
>   cpu.realize();
> 
> I don't see any benefits in keeping cpu_x86_init() around and if we start
> touching it then just lets get rid of it in one step.

To my regret, CPU subclasses have moved to the end of your two queues. I
was considering doing a proposal to fast-track that for symmetry with
the other targets and gradually improve that with the pending properties
series (that now depend on qdev, which I find rather nasty to review),
but I have my hands quite full currently, no promises...

Andreas

> 
>> x86_cpu_realize(), and add two x86_cpu_realize() calls:
>>
>> - One on cpu_init(), that is called only by *-user
>> - One on pc_cpu_init(), that will include the more advanced PC CPU
>>   initialization steps
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <address@hidden>
>> ---
>>  hw/pc.c              | 12 +++++++++++-
>>  target-i386/cpu.h    | 14 ++++++++++++++
>>  target-i386/helper.c | 11 ++++-------
>>  3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/pc.c b/hw/pc.c
>> index 85eab04..c209d3d 100644
>> --- a/hw/pc.c
>> +++ b/hw/pc.c
>> @@ -861,10 +861,20 @@ void pc_acpi_smi_interrupt(void *opaque, int irq, int
>> level) 
>>  static void pc_cpu_init(PCInitArgs *args, int cpu_index)
>>  {
>> -    if (!cpu_x86_init(args->qemu_args->cpu_model)) {
>> +    Error *err = NULL;
>> +    X86CPU *cpu;
>> +
>> +    cpu = cpu_x86_init(args->qemu_args->cpu_model);
>> +    if (!cpu) {
>>          fprintf(stderr, "Unable to find x86 CPU definition\n");
>>          exit(1);
>>      }
>> +
>> +    x86_cpu_realize(OBJECT(cpu), &err);
>> +    if (err) {
>> +        error_report("pc_cpu_init: %s\n", error_get_pretty(err));
>> +        exit(1);
>> +    }
>>  }
>>  
>>  void pc_cpus_init(PCInitArgs *args)
>> diff --git a/target-i386/cpu.h b/target-i386/cpu.h
>> index 871c270..6853b17 100644
>> --- a/target-i386/cpu.h
>> +++ b/target-i386/cpu.h
>> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
>>  
>>  #include "config.h"
>>  #include "qemu-common.h"
>> +#include "qemu-error.h"
>>  
>>  #ifdef TARGET_X86_64
>>  #define TARGET_LONG_BITS 64
>> @@ -1008,12 +1009,25 @@ uint64_t cpu_get_tsc(CPUX86State *env);
>>  #define TARGET_VIRT_ADDR_SPACE_BITS 32
>>  #endif
>>  
>> +/* Helper for simple CPU initialization (for target-independent code)
>> + *
>> + * Note that the PC code doesn't use this function, as it does additional
>> + * initialization steps between cpu_x86_init() and cpu_x86_realize() is
>> called.
>> + */
>>  static inline CPUX86State *cpu_init(const char *cpu_model)
>>  {
>> +    Error *err = NULL;
>>      X86CPU *cpu = cpu_x86_init(cpu_model);
>>      if (cpu == NULL) {
>>          return NULL;
>>      }
>> +
>> +    x86_cpu_realize(OBJECT(cpu), &err);
>> +    if (err) {
>> +        error_report("cpu_init: %s\n", error_get_pretty(err));
>> +        return NULL;
>> +    }
>> +
>>      return &cpu->env;
>>  }
>>  
>> diff --git a/target-i386/helper.c b/target-i386/helper.c
>> index 1e5f61f..87a9221 100644
>> --- a/target-i386/helper.c
>> +++ b/target-i386/helper.c
>> @@ -1240,11 +1240,14 @@ int cpu_x86_get_descr_debug(CPUX86State *env,
>> unsigned int selector, return 1;
>>  }
>>  
>> +/* Initialize X86CPU object
>> + *
>> + * Callers must eventually call x86_cpu_realize(), to finish
>> initialization.
>> + */
>>  X86CPU *cpu_x86_init(const char *cpu_model)
>>  {
>>      X86CPU *cpu;
>>      CPUX86State *env;
>> -    Error *err = NULL;
>>  
>>      cpu = X86_CPU(object_new(TYPE_X86_CPU));
>>      env = &cpu->env;
>> @@ -1255,12 +1258,6 @@ X86CPU *cpu_x86_init(const char *cpu_model)
>>          return NULL;
>>      }
>>  
>> -    x86_cpu_realize(OBJECT(cpu), &err);
>> -    if (err) {
>> -        error_report("cpu_x86_init: %s\n", error_get_pretty(err));
>> -        return NULL;
>> -    }
>> -
>>      return cpu;
>>  }
>>  
> 


-- 
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]