[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v12 09/14] target-mips: Add ASE DSP bit/manipula
From: |
Aurelien Jarno |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v12 09/14] target-mips: Add ASE DSP bit/manipulation instructions |
Date: |
Wed, 31 Oct 2012 20:20:49 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 09:29:30PM +0800, Jia Liu wrote:
> Hi Richard Peter Jovanovic and Aurelien,
>
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Richard Henderson <address@hidden> wrote:
> > On 2012-10-31 01:44, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> On 30 October 2012 15:34, Jia Liu <address@hidden> wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Jovanovic, Petar <address@hidden> wrote:
> >>>>> imm = (int16_t)(imm << 6) >> 6;
> >>>>
> >>>> result of a bitwise shift of a signed type and a negative vlaue is
> >>>> implementation-defined, so you can not rely on that.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> I think it will take a 10bits signed value sign extend into 16bits
> >>> signed value, and I've tested it with negative values, it working
> >>> well.
> >>
> >> You cannot rely on the behaviour of a specific compiler implementation
> >> as evidence that a piece of code is correct. C has a standard which
> >> defines what is and is not valid.
> >
> > Indeed. The only portable way is
> >
> > val = ((val & (sign | (sign - 1))) ^ sign) - sign
> >
> > with all unsigned types, and "sign" set to the sign bit.
> >
>
> Thank you very much for the code.
>
> Is this time OK?
As said by Peter, I don't think the code should be modified, the
previous code was fine.
> static void gen_mipsdsp_bitinsn(CPUMIPSState *env, DisasContext *ctx,
> uint32_t op1, uint32_t op2,
> int ret, int val)
> {
> const char *opn = "mipsdsp Bit/ Manipulation";
> TCGv t0;
> TCGv val_t;
>
> if (ret == 0) {
> /* Treat as NOP. */
> MIPS_DEBUG("NOP");
> return;
> }
>
> t0 = tcg_temp_new();
> val_t = tcg_temp_new();
> gen_load_gpr(val_t, val);
>
> #define SIGN_EXTEND10_16(val, sign) \
> val = (((val & (sign | (sign - 1))) ^ sign) - sign)
>
> switch (op1) {
> case OPC_ABSQ_S_PH_DSP:
> switch (op2) {
> case OPC_BITREV:
> check_dsp(ctx);
> gen_helper_bitrev(cpu_gpr[ret], val_t);
> break;
> case OPC_REPL_QB:
> check_dsp(ctx);
> {
> uint32_t imm;
> target_long result;
>
> imm = (ctx->opcode >> 16) & 0xFF;
> result = imm << 24 | imm << 16 | imm << 8 | imm;
> result = (int32_t)result;
> tcg_gen_movi_tl(cpu_gpr[ret], result);
> }
> break;
> case OPC_REPLV_QB:
> check_dsp(ctx);
> tcg_gen_ext8u_tl(cpu_gpr[ret], val_t);
> tcg_gen_shli_tl(t0, cpu_gpr[ret], 8);
> tcg_gen_or_tl(cpu_gpr[ret], cpu_gpr[ret], t0);
> tcg_gen_shli_tl(t0, cpu_gpr[ret], 16);
> tcg_gen_or_tl(cpu_gpr[ret], cpu_gpr[ret], t0);
> tcg_gen_ext32s_tl(cpu_gpr[ret], cpu_gpr[ret]);
> break;
> case OPC_REPL_PH:
> check_dsp(ctx);
> {
> uint16_t imm;
> imm = (ctx->opcode >> 16) & 0x03FF;
> SIGN_EXTEND10_16(imm, 0x200);
> tcg_gen_movi_tl(cpu_gpr[ret],
> (target_long)(int32_t)
> ((uint32_t)imm << 16 | imm));
> }
> break;
> case OPC_REPLV_PH:
> check_dsp(ctx);
> tcg_gen_ext16u_tl(cpu_gpr[ret], val_t);
> tcg_gen_shli_tl(t0, cpu_gpr[ret], 16);
> tcg_gen_or_tl(cpu_gpr[ret], cpu_gpr[ret], t0);
> tcg_gen_ext32s_tl(cpu_gpr[ret], cpu_gpr[ret]);
> break;
> }
> break;
> #ifdef TARGET_MIPS64
> case OPC_ABSQ_S_QH_DSP:
> switch (op2) {
> case OPC_REPL_OB:
> check_dsp(ctx);
> {
> target_ulong imm;
>
> imm = (ctx->opcode >> 16) & 0xFF;
> imm = (imm << 8) | imm;
> imm = (imm << 16) | imm;
> imm = (imm << 32) | imm;
> tcg_gen_movi_tl(cpu_gpr[ret], imm);
> break;
> }
> case OPC_REPL_PW:
> check_dsp(ctx);
> {
> target_long imm;
>
> imm = (ctx->opcode >> 16) & 0x03FF;
> SIGN_EXTEND10_16(imm, 0x200);
> tcg_gen_movi_tl(cpu_gpr[ret],
> (imm << 32) | (imm & 0xFFFFFFFF));
> break;
> }
> case OPC_REPL_QH:
> check_dsp(ctx);
> {
> target_ulong imm;
>
> imm = (ctx->opcode >> 16) & 0x03FF;
> SIGN_EXTEND10_16(imm, 0x200);
>
> imm = imm & 0xFFFF;
> imm = (imm << 48) | (imm << 32) | (imm << 16) | imm;
> tcg_gen_movi_tl(cpu_gpr[ret], imm);
> break;
> }
> case OPC_REPLV_OB:
> check_dsp(ctx);
> tcg_gen_ext8u_tl(cpu_gpr[ret], val_t);
> tcg_gen_shli_tl(t0, cpu_gpr[ret], 8);
> tcg_gen_or_tl(cpu_gpr[ret], cpu_gpr[ret], t0);
> tcg_gen_shli_tl(t0, cpu_gpr[ret], 16);
> tcg_gen_or_tl(cpu_gpr[ret], cpu_gpr[ret], t0);
> tcg_gen_shli_tl(t0, cpu_gpr[ret], 32);
> tcg_gen_or_tl(cpu_gpr[ret], cpu_gpr[ret], t0);
> break;
> case OPC_REPLV_PW:
> check_dsp(ctx);
> tcg_gen_ext32u_i64(cpu_gpr[ret], val_t);
> tcg_gen_shli_tl(t0, cpu_gpr[ret], 32);
> tcg_gen_or_tl(cpu_gpr[ret], cpu_gpr[ret], t0);
> break;
> case OPC_REPLV_QH:
> check_dsp(ctx);
> tcg_gen_ext16u_tl(cpu_gpr[ret], val_t);
> tcg_gen_shli_tl(t0, cpu_gpr[ret], 16);
> tcg_gen_or_tl(cpu_gpr[ret], cpu_gpr[ret], t0);
> tcg_gen_shli_tl(t0, cpu_gpr[ret], 32);
> tcg_gen_or_tl(cpu_gpr[ret], cpu_gpr[ret], t0);
> break;
> }
> break;
> #endif
> }
>
> #undef SIGN_EXTEND10_16
> tcg_temp_free(t0);
> tcg_temp_free(val_t);
>
> (void)opn; /* avoid a compiler warning */
> MIPS_DEBUG("%s", opn);
> }
>
>
> >>
> >> Having said that, right shift of negative signed integers is one of
> >> those bits of implementation defined behaviour which we allow ourselves
> >> to rely on in QEMU because all the platforms we care about behave
> >> that way. (That integers are 2s complement representation is another.)
> >
> > Also very true. I don't like seeing the code in question though.
> > We've several implementations of sign-extend-to-N-bits functions
> > throughout qemu; we ought to unify them.
> >
> >
> > r~
>
> Regards,
> Jia.
>
>
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
address@hidden http://www.aurel32.net
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v12 09/14] target-mips: Add ASE DSP bit/manipulation instructions, Jovanovic, Petar, 2012/10/27
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v12 09/14] target-mips: Add ASE DSP bit/manipulation instructions, Jia Liu, 2012/10/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v12 09/14] target-mips: Add ASE DSP bit/manipulation instructions, Jovanovic, Petar, 2012/10/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v12 09/14] target-mips: Add ASE DSP bit/manipulation instructions, Jia Liu, 2012/10/30
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v12 09/14] target-mips: Add ASE DSP bit/manipulation instructions, Peter Maydell, 2012/10/30
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v12 09/14] target-mips: Add ASE DSP bit/manipulation instructions, Richard Henderson, 2012/10/31
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v12 09/14] target-mips: Add ASE DSP bit/manipulation instructions, Jia Liu, 2012/10/31
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v12 09/14] target-mips: Add ASE DSP bit/manipulation instructions,
Aurelien Jarno <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v12 09/14] target-mips: Add ASE DSP bit/manipulation instructions, Jia Liu, 2012/10/31
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v12 09/14] target-mips: Add ASE DSP bit/manipulation instructions, Peter Maydell, 2012/10/30