qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv2 1/4] Adding new syscalls (bugzilla 855162)


From: Paul Moore
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv2 1/4] Adding new syscalls (bugzilla 855162)
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 10:10:42 -0400
User-agent: KMail/4.9.2 (Linux/3.6.4-gentoo; KDE/4.9.2; x86_64; ; )

On Friday, November 02, 2012 12:29:37 AM Eduardo Otubo wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 05:43:03PM -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Tuesday, October 23, 2012 03:55:29 AM Eduardo Otubo wrote:
> > > According to the bug 855162[0] - there's the need of adding new syscalls
> > > to the whitelist whenn using Qemu with Libvirt.
> > > 
> > > [0] - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855162
> > > 
> > > v2: Adding new syscalls to the list: readlink, rt_sigpending, and
> > > 
> > >     rt_sigtimedwait
> > > 
> > > Reported-by: Paul Moore <address@hidden>
> > > Signed-off-by: Eduardo Otubo <address@hidden>
> > > ---
> > > 
> > >  qemu-seccomp.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
> > >  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > I had an opportunity to test this patchset on a F17 machine using QEMU 1.2
> > and unfortunately it still fails.  I'm using a relatively basic guest
> > configuration running F16, the details are documented in the RH BZ that
> > Eduardo mentioned in the patch description.
> > 
> > Eduardo, I assume you are not able to reproduce this?
> 
> Unfortunately no. But we have the v3  patchset coming soon with new
> syscalls and we're hoping to get this fixed. Thanks for the feedback
> Paul!

No problem, thanks for all your work on this patchset.

-- 
paul moore
security and virtualization @ redhat




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]