qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 1/3] virtio-bus : Introduce VirtioBus.


From: KONRAD Frédéric
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 1/3] virtio-bus : Introduce VirtioBus.
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:18:45 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121029 Thunderbird/16.0.2

On 21/11/2012 15:13, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 21.11.2012 15:05, schrieb KONRAD Frédéric:
On 21/11/2012 14:04, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 16.11.2012 16:35, schrieb address@hidden:
+#define DEBUG_VIRTIO_BUS
+
+#ifdef DEBUG_VIRTIO_BUS
+
+#define DPRINTF(fmt, ...) \
+do { printf("virtio_bus: " fmt , ## __VA_ARGS__); } while (0)
+#else
+#define DPRINTF(fmt, ...) do {} while (0)
+#endif
We recently had a discussion about bitrotting DPRINTF() statements where
I suggested to use if (0) instead of a no-op macro like this that
doesn't reference fmt and the varargs.
I don't understand what you suggested, can you point me to an example ?
I don't have a link at hand, maybe Evgeny does. It was along the lines of:

#define DEBUG_VIRTIO_BUS 0

#define DPRINTF(fmt, ...) if (DEBUG_VIRTIO_BUS) { \
         printf("virtio_bus: " fmt , ## __VA_ARGS__); \
     }

The officially preferred alternative is to use tracepoints. ;)

Cheers,
Andreas

ok, thanks.

Fred



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]