[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] use int64_t for return values from rbd instead
From: |
Peter Maydell |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] use int64_t for return values from rbd instead of int |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Nov 2012 08:40:15 +0000 |
On 22 November 2012 08:23, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
<address@hidden> wrote:
> Am 21.11.2012 23:32, schrieb Peter Maydell:
>> Looking at the librbd API (which is what the size and ret
>> values come from), it uses size_t and ssize_t for these.
>> So I think probably ssize_t is the right type for ret
>> (and size) in our structs here.
>
>
> This sounds reasonable but does ssize_t support negative values? For error
> values.
Yes, the first 's' in ssize_t means 'signed' and is the
difference between it and size_t.
-- PMM
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] use int64_t for return values from rbd instead of int, (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] use int64_t for return values from rbd instead of int, Stefan Priebe, 2012/11/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] use int64_t for return values from rbd instead of int, Stefan Hajnoczi, 2012/11/21
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] use int64_t for return values from rbd instead of int, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG, 2012/11/21
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] use int64_t for return values from rbd instead of int, Stefan Hajnoczi, 2012/11/21
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] use int64_t for return values from rbd instead of int, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG, 2012/11/21
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] use int64_t for return values from rbd instead of int, Stefan Hajnoczi, 2012/11/21
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] use int64_t for return values from rbd instead of int, Stefan Weil, 2012/11/21