[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/5] RFC: Efficient VM backup for qemu (v1)
From: |
Dietmar Maurer |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/5] RFC: Efficient VM backup for qemu (v1) |
Date: |
Fri, 23 Nov 2012 06:13:50 +0000 |
> > The VMDK format has strong disadvantages:
> >
> > - unclear License (the spec links to patents)
>
> I've already pointed out that you're taking an inconsistent position on this
> point. It's FUD.
>
> > - they use a very slow compression algorithm (deflate), which makes it
> > unusable for backup
>
> I've already pointed out that we can optionally support other algorithms.
Well, I guess we both pointed out our opinions.
I will try to implement some kind of plugging architecture for backup formats.
That way we can implement/support more than one format.
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/5] RFC: Efficient VM backup for qemu (v1), (continued)
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/5] RFC: Efficient VM backup for qemu (v1), Dietmar Maurer, 2012/11/22
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/5] RFC: Efficient VM backup for qemu (v1), Stefan Hajnoczi, 2012/11/22
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/5] RFC: Efficient VM backup for qemu (v1),
Dietmar Maurer <=
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/5] RFC: Efficient VM backup for qemu (v1), Dietmar Maurer, 2012/11/22
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/5] RFC: Efficient VM backup for qemu (v1), Stefan Hajnoczi, 2012/11/23
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/5] RFC: Efficient VM backup for qemu (v1), Dietmar Maurer, 2012/11/22
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/5] RFC: Efficient VM backup for qemu (v1), Stefan Hajnoczi, 2012/11/23
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/5] RFC: Efficient VM backup for qemu (v1), Dietmar Maurer, 2012/11/23
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/5] RFC: Efficient VM backup for qemu (v1), Dietmar Maurer, 2012/11/22
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/5] RFC: Efficient VM backup for qemu (v1), Wenchao Xia, 2012/11/27