qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] target-i386:make hw_breakpoint_enabled retu


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] target-i386:make hw_breakpoint_enabled return bool type
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 10:23:27 +0000

On 4 December 2012 08:11, liguang <address@hidden> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: liguang <address@hidden>
> ---
>  target-i386/cpu.h |    4 ++--
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target-i386/cpu.h b/target-i386/cpu.h
> index 9abec3e..8ca25c8 100644
> --- a/target-i386/cpu.h
> +++ b/target-i386/cpu.h
> @@ -996,9 +996,9 @@ int cpu_x86_handle_mmu_fault(CPUX86State *env, 
> target_ulong addr,
>  #define cpu_handle_mmu_fault cpu_x86_handle_mmu_fault
>  void cpu_x86_set_a20(CPUX86State *env, int a20_state);
>
> -static inline int hw_breakpoint_enabled(unsigned long dr7, int index)
> +static inline bool hw_breakpoint_enabled(unsigned long dr7, int index)
>  {
> -    return (dr7 >> (index * 2)) & 3;
> +    return !!((dr7 >> (index * 2)) & 3);
>  }
>
>  static inline int hw_breakpoint_type(unsigned long dr7, int index)

Doesn't this break the use of this function in target-i386/seg_helper.c:

  if (hw_breakpoint_enabled(env->dr[7], i) == 0x1) {

which specifically wants to determine whether the breakpoint is
enabled only locally?

-- PMM



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]