[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 00/10] i8254, i8259 and running Microport UNI
|
From: |
Jan Kiszka |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 00/10] i8254, i8259 and running Microport UNIX (ca 1987) |
|
Date: |
Wed, 12 Dec 2012 12:38:33 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); de; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080226 SUSE/2.0.0.12-1.1 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 |
On 2012-12-12 12:36, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>> How about things like pit_get_out(),
>> pit_get_next_transition_time(), etc in qemu/hw/i8254_common.c? (If
>> not used when KVM is enabled, then why are they "common"?) What
>> are the implications if qemu and KVM implementations of such
>> functions disagree?
>>
> They are common because they work on device state that can comes from
> either QEMU device emulation or kvm device emulation. Why QEMU even touches
> KVM's device state other than for migration I do not know. Jan?
PC speaker emulation.
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SDP-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux