qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 15/26] uhci: Limit amount of frames processed in one


From: Hans de Goede
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 15/26] uhci: Limit amount of frames processed in one go
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 14:35:36 +0100

Before this patch uhci would process an unlimited amount of frames when
behind on schedule, by setting the timer to a time already past, causing the
timer subsys to immediately recall the frame_timer function gain.

This would cause invalid cancellations of bulk queues when the catching up
processed more then 32 frames at a moment when the bulk qh was temporarily
unlinked (which the Linux uhci driver does).

This patch fixes this by processing maximum 16 frames in one go, and always
setting the timer one ms later, making the code behave more like the ehci
code.

Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <address@hidden>
---
 hw/usb/hcd-uhci.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/usb/hcd-uhci.c b/hw/usb/hcd-uhci.c
index 11ccdc8..2a5d4cc 100644
--- a/hw/usb/hcd-uhci.c
+++ b/hw/usb/hcd-uhci.c
@@ -78,6 +78,8 @@
 /* Must be large enough to handle 10 frame delay for initial isoc requests */
 #define QH_VALID         32
 
+#define MAX_FRAMES_PER_TICK    (QH_VALID / 2)
+
 #define NB_PORTS 2
 
 enum {
@@ -500,7 +502,7 @@ static void uhci_ioport_writew(void *opaque, uint32_t addr, 
uint32_t val)
             trace_usb_uhci_schedule_start();
             s->expire_time = qemu_get_clock_ns(vm_clock) +
                 (get_ticks_per_sec() / FRAME_TIMER_FREQ);
-            qemu_mod_timer(s->frame_timer, qemu_get_clock_ns(vm_clock));
+            qemu_mod_timer(s->frame_timer, s->expire_time);
             s->status &= ~UHCI_STS_HCHALTED;
         } else if (!(val & UHCI_CMD_RS)) {
             s->status |= UHCI_STS_HCHALTED;
@@ -1176,10 +1178,10 @@ static void uhci_bh(void *opaque)
 static void uhci_frame_timer(void *opaque)
 {
     UHCIState *s = opaque;
+    uint64_t t_now, t_last_run;
+    int i, frames;
+    const uint64_t frame_t = get_ticks_per_sec() / FRAME_TIMER_FREQ;
 
-    /* prepare the timer for the next frame */
-    s->expire_time += (get_ticks_per_sec() / FRAME_TIMER_FREQ);
-    s->frame_bytes = 0;
     s->completions_only = false;
     qemu_bh_cancel(s->bh);
 
@@ -1193,20 +1195,29 @@ static void uhci_frame_timer(void *opaque)
         return;
     }
 
-    /* Process the current frame */
-    trace_usb_uhci_frame_start(s->frnum);
-
-    uhci_async_validate_begin(s);
-
-    uhci_process_frame(s);
+    /* We still store expire_time in our state, for migration */
+    t_last_run = s->expire_time - frame_t;
+    t_now = qemu_get_clock_ns(vm_clock);
 
-    uhci_async_validate_end(s);
+    /* Process up to MAX_FRAMES_PER_TICK frames */
+    frames = (t_now - t_last_run) / frame_t;
+    if (frames > MAX_FRAMES_PER_TICK) {
+        frames = MAX_FRAMES_PER_TICK;
+    }
 
-    /* The uhci spec says frnum reflects the frame currently being processed,
-     * and the guest must look at frnum - 1 on interrupt, so inc frnum now */
-    s->frnum = (s->frnum + 1) & 0x7ff;
+    for (i = 0; i < frames; i++) {
+        s->frame_bytes = 0;
+        trace_usb_uhci_frame_start(s->frnum);
+        uhci_async_validate_begin(s);
+        uhci_process_frame(s);
+        uhci_async_validate_end(s);
+        /* The spec says frnum is the frame currently being processed, and
+         * the guest must look at frnum - 1 on interrupt, so inc frnum now */
+        s->frnum = (s->frnum + 1) & 0x7ff;
+        s->expire_time += frame_t;
+    }
 
-    /* Complete the previous frame */
+    /* Complete the previous frame(s) */
     if (s->pending_int_mask) {
         s->status2 |= s->pending_int_mask;
         s->status  |= UHCI_STS_USBINT;
@@ -1214,7 +1225,7 @@ static void uhci_frame_timer(void *opaque)
     }
     s->pending_int_mask = 0;
 
-    qemu_mod_timer(s->frame_timer, s->expire_time);
+    qemu_mod_timer(s->frame_timer, t_now + frame_t);
 }
 
 static const MemoryRegionPortio uhci_portio[] = {
-- 
1.8.0.1




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]