qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Added uapi directory into linux-header


From: Bhushan Bharat-R65777
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Added uapi directory into linux-header
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 15:02:41 +0000


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexander Graf [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 8:24 PM
> To: Bhushan Bharat-R65777
> Cc: qemu-devel qemu-devel; address@hidden List; Jan Kiszka; Peter Maydell
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Added uapi directory into linux-header
> 
> 
> On 17.12.2012, at 15:51, Bhushan Bharat-R65777 wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Alexander Graf [mailto:address@hidden
> >> Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 7:45 PM
> >> To: Bhushan Bharat-R65777
> >> Cc: qemu-devel qemu-devel; address@hidden List; Bhushan
> >> Bharat-R65777; Jan Kiszka; Peter Maydell
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Added uapi directory into linux-header
> >>
> >>
> >> On 17.12.2012, at 05:08, Bharat Bhushan wrote:
> >>
> >>> Linux ARCH specific header files are now in uapi/ directory also.
> >>> These header files (epapr_hcalls.h on powerpc) are needed in qemu in
> >>> linux-headers/uapi/asm/ directory as these are referenced by other
> >>> header files in linux-headers/asm/.
> >>>
> >>> This patch is about changing the scripts for same.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Bharat Bhushan <address@hidden>
> >>
> >> Please include people who were participating in the discussion
> >> previously in CC when you post a new version.
> >>
> >>> ---
> >>> configure                       |    1 +
> >>> scripts/update-linux-headers.sh |   10 ++++++++++
> >>> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/configure b/configure
> >>> index 38b1cc6..51cce6b 100755
> >>> --- a/configure
> >>> +++ b/configure
> >>> @@ -3724,6 +3724,7 @@ if test "$linux" = "yes" ; then
> >>>    # For non-KVM architectures we will not have asm headers
> >>>    if [ -e "$source_path/linux-headers/asm-$linux_arch" ]; then
> >>>      symlink "$source_path/linux-headers/asm-$linux_arch"
> >>> linux-headers/asm
> >>> +      symlink "$source_path/linux-headers/uapi/asm-$linux_arch"
> >>> + linux-headers/uapi/asm
> >>
> >> This is still wrong. You want this guarded by another if [ -e ].
> >
> > This is not wrong because ....
> >
> >>
> >>>    fi
> >>> fi
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/scripts/update-linux-headers.sh
> >>> b/scripts/update-linux-headers.sh index 4c7b566..d40f9c4 100755
> >>> --- a/scripts/update-linux-headers.sh
> >>> +++ b/scripts/update-linux-headers.sh
> >>> @@ -46,14 +46,24 @@ for arch in $ARCHLIST; do
> >>>
> >>>    make -C "$linux" INSTALL_HDR_PATH="$tmpdir" SRCARCH=$arch
> >>> headers_install
> >>>
> >>> +    if ! [ -e "$output/linux-headers/uapi" ] ; then
> >>> +        mkdir "$output/linux-headers/uapi"
> >>> +    fi
> >>
> >> ... which would mean you don't need this bit.
> >
> > ... because here we ensure that the directory exists.
> 
> But that means we create a uapi directory for archs that don't have one, 
> right?

Yes, I think that's the direction going forward (user specific header files in 
uapi/).

> 
> >
> >>
> >>> +
> >>>    rm -rf "$output/linux-headers/asm-$arch"
> >>>    mkdir -p "$output/linux-headers/asm-$arch"
> >>> +    rm -rf "$output/linux-headers/uapi/asm-$arch"
> >>> +    mkdir -p "$output/linux-headers/uapi/asm-$arch"
> >>
> >> Only if it exists, no?
> >
> > Above it is ensured that the directory always exists ..
> >
> >>
> >>> +
> >>>    for header in kvm.h kvm_para.h; do
> >>>        cp "$tmpdir/include/asm/$header" "$output/linux-headers/asm-$arch"
> >>>    done
> >>>    if [ $arch = x86 ]; then
> >>>        cp "$tmpdir/include/asm/hyperv.h" "$output/linux-headers/asm-x86"
> >>>    fi
> >>> +    if [ $arch = powerpc ]; then
> >>> +        cp "$linux/arch/$arch/include/uapi/asm/epapr_hcalls.h"
> >> "$output/linux-headers/uapi/asm-$arch/"
> >>> +    fi
> >>
> >> Why is this pointing at $linux and not $tmpdir?
> >
> > Because I found that $tmpdir does not have epapr_haclls.h, though I do not
> know why ? any idea why ?
> 
> Smells like a kernel bug :). In fact, I remember that we used to forget
> uapi/asm/epapr_hcalls.h in the header list a while ago.

I am not able to locate which command (set of commands) are installing the 
header files (all/selectively header files of arch/powerpc/include/asm/ and 
arch/powerp/include/uapi/asm/) in $tmpdir/

> Are you sure you're
> basing on the latest kvm code?

kvm-ppc-next branch of http://github.com/agraf/linux-2.6.git 

-Bharat

> 
> 
> Alex
> 
> >
> >> Also, no need for $arch - be
> >> explicit and make it "powerpc".
> >
> > Ok.
> >
> > -Bharat
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Alex
> >>
> >>> done
> >>>
> >>> rm -rf "$output/linux-headers/linux"
> >>> --
> >>> 1.7.0.4
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> 





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]