qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU build fails with Clang?


From: Brad Smith
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU build fails with Clang?
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 22:26:23 -0500
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 07:19:11PM -0800, Ashley wrote:
> On 1/5/2013 8:51 AM, Blue Swirl wrote:
> >On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 1:48 AM, Brad Smith <address@hidden> wrote:
> >>Supposedly QEMU is able to build with Clang and yet trying to do so
> >>I am seeing the build fail as follows..
> >>
> >>Comments?
> >
> >Clang does not support this kind of assembly code yet. The attached
> >patch avoids this by using 'as' and 'cpp' for .S files, please try. It
> >could still fail if the 'as' does not come from binutils.
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>gmake[1]: Entering directory `/home/brad/qemu/pc-bios/optionrom'
> >>clang -I. -I/home/brad/qemu -I/home/brad/qemu/include 
> >>-I/home/brad/qemu/libcacard -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Werror 
> >>-fomit-frame-pointer -fno-builtin -I/home/brad/qemu   -fno-stack-protector 
> >>-MMD -MP -MT multiboot.o -MF ./multiboot.d -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes 
> >>-Werror -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-builtin -I/home/brad/qemu   
> >>-fno-stack-protector -c -o multiboot.o multiboot.S
> >>multiboot.S:31:1: error: unexpected directive .code16
> >>.code16; .text; .global _start; _start:; .short 0xaa55; .byte (_end - 
> >>_start) / 512; lret; .org 0x18; .short 0; .short _pnph; _pnph: .ascii 
> >>"$PnP"; .byte 0x01; .byte ( _pnph_len / 16 ); .short 0x0000; .byte 0x00; 
> >>.byte 0x00; .long 0x00000000; .short _manufacturer; .short _product; .long 
> >>0x00000000; .short 0x0000; .short 0x0000; .short _bev; .short 0x0000; 
> >>.short 0x0000; .equ _pnph_len, . - _pnph; _bev:; movw %cs, %ax; movw %ax, 
> >>%ds;
> >>^
> >>multiboot.S:31:8: error: .code16 not supported yet
> >>.code16; .text; .global _start; _start:; .short 0xaa55; .byte (_end - 
> >>_start) / 512; lret; .org 0x18; .short 0; .short _pnph; _pnph: .ascii 
> >>"$PnP"; .byte 0x01; .byte ( _pnph_len / 16 ); .short 0x0000; .byte 0x00; 
> >>.byte 0x00; .long 0x00000000; .short _manufacturer; .short _product; .long 
> >>0x00000000; .short 0x0000; .short 0x0000; .short _bev; .short 0x0000; 
> >>.short 0x0000; .equ _pnph_len, . - _pnph; _bev:; movw %cs, %ax; movw %ax, 
> >>%ds;
> >>        ^
> >>multiboot.S:71:135: error: unknown directive
> >>  read_fw 0x0a; mov %eax, %edi; read_fw 0x0b; mov %eax, %ecx; mov $0x12, 
> >> %ax; mov $0x510, %edx; outw %ax, (%dx); mov $0x511, %dx; cld; .dc.b 
> >> 0xf3,0x6c
> >>                                                                            
> >>                                                            ^
> >>multiboot.S:102:2: error: unknown directive
> >>  .dc.b 0x26,0x67,0x66,0x89,0x4f,0xfc
> >>  ^
> >>multiboot.S:130:17: error: unexpected token in argument list
> >>  data32 lgdt %gs:6
> >>                 ^
> >>multiboot.S:138:15: error: unknown token in expression
> >>  data32 ljmp *%gs:0
> >>               ^
> >>multiboot.S:152:135: error: unknown directive
> >>  read_fw 0x07; mov %eax, %edi; read_fw 0x08; mov %eax, %ecx; mov $0x11, 
> >> %ax; mov $0x510, %edx; outw %ax, (%dx); mov $0x511, %dx; cld; .dc.b 
> >> 0xf3,0x6c
> >>                                                                            
> >>                                                            ^
> >>gmake[1]: *** [multiboot.o] Error 1
> >>
> >>--
> >>This message has been scanned for viruses and
> >>dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> >>believed to be clean.
> >>
> >>
> 
> Have you committed this to the git? (or is the term push)

Considering I'm still building and haven't replied yet.. no.

> I think that might be a good idea if you haven't (or some variation
> of this fix) because clang is going to be the "official" C/C++
> compiler in FreeBSD 10 (as I've heard).

It's known as the system compiler and that is already the case. Although
I'm not using FreeBSD and this is still important even if not using FreeBSD.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]