qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 21/31] openpic: add some bounds checking for IRQ num


From: Alexander Graf
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 21/31] openpic: add some bounds checking for IRQ numbers
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 16:38:50 +0100

From: Scott Wood <address@hidden>

The two checks with abort() guard against potential QEMU-internal
problems, but the EOI check stops the guest from causing updates to queue
position -1 and other havoc if it writes EOI with no interrupt in
service.

Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <address@hidden>
[agraf: remove hunk in code that didn't get applied yet]
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <address@hidden>
---
 hw/openpic.c |   11 +++++++++++
 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/openpic.c b/hw/openpic.c
index b54308d..35a7fe3 100644
--- a/hw/openpic.c
+++ b/hw/openpic.c
@@ -414,6 +414,11 @@ static void openpic_set_irq(void *opaque, int n_IRQ, int 
level)
     OpenPICState *opp = opaque;
     IRQSource *src;
 
+    if (n_IRQ >= MAX_IRQ) {
+        fprintf(stderr, "%s: IRQ %d out of range\n", __func__, n_IRQ);
+        abort();
+    }
+
     src = &opp->src[n_IRQ];
     DPRINTF("openpic: set irq %d = %d ivpr=0x%08x\n",
             n_IRQ, level, src->ivpr);
@@ -888,6 +893,12 @@ static void openpic_cpu_write_internal(void *opaque, 
hwaddr addr,
     case 0xB0: /* EOI */
         DPRINTF("EOI\n");
         s_IRQ = IRQ_get_next(opp, &dst->servicing);
+
+        if (s_IRQ < 0) {
+            DPRINTF("%s: EOI with no interrupt in service\n", __func__);
+            break;
+        }
+
         IRQ_resetbit(&dst->servicing, s_IRQ);
         /* Set up next servicing IRQ */
         s_IRQ = IRQ_get_next(opp, &dst->servicing);
-- 
1.6.0.2




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]