[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qdev: obey no_user
From: |
Peter Maydell |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qdev: obey no_user |
Date: |
Mon, 7 Jan 2013 20:16:17 +0000 |
On 7 January 2013 20:12, Anthony Liguori <address@hidden> wrote:
> Peter Maydell <address@hidden> writes:
>> It seems to me like arbitrarily allowing the monitor to construct
>> no-user devices isn't really the right way to attack the problem
>> of "allow complete machine construction by management tools"...
>
> There is no such thing as a 'no-user' device. It's a silly distinction
> that has never had a consistent meaning.
Then let's just rip that flag out completely.
-- PMM
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qdev: obey no_user, Christian Borntraeger, 2013/01/07
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qdev: obey no_user, Andreas Färber, 2013/01/07
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qdev: obey no_user, Anthony Liguori, 2013/01/07
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qdev: obey no_user, Peter Maydell, 2013/01/07
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qdev: obey no_user, Anthony Liguori, 2013/01/07
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qdev: obey no_user,
Peter Maydell <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qdev: obey no_user, Anthony Liguori, 2013/01/07
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qdev: obey no_user, Andreas Färber, 2013/01/07
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qdev: obey no_user, Peter Maydell, 2013/01/07
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qdev: obey no_user, Andreas Färber, 2013/01/07
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qdev: obey no_user, Anthony Liguori, 2013/01/07
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qdev: obey no_user, Christian Borntraeger, 2013/01/07