[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qdev: obey no_user
From: |
Peter Maydell |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qdev: obey no_user |
Date: |
Mon, 7 Jan 2013 22:20:39 +0000 |
On 7 January 2013 22:10, Andreas Färber <address@hidden> wrote:
> Am 07.01.2013 21:16, schrieb Peter Maydell:
>> On 7 January 2013 20:12, Anthony Liguori <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> Peter Maydell <address@hidden> writes:
>>>> It seems to me like arbitrarily allowing the monitor to construct
>>>> no-user devices isn't really the right way to attack the problem
>>>> of "allow complete machine construction by management tools"...
>>>
>>> There is no such thing as a 'no-user' device. It's a silly distinction
>>> that has never had a consistent meaning.
>>
>> Then let's just rip that flag out completely.
>
> That's a bad idea, given that we are about to make the CPU a device.
We already have a pile of devices which the user can't usefully
use -device on...CPUs would be just another one, right?
-- PMM
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qdev: obey no_user, Christian Borntraeger, 2013/01/07
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qdev: obey no_user, Andreas Färber, 2013/01/07
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qdev: obey no_user, Anthony Liguori, 2013/01/07
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qdev: obey no_user, Peter Maydell, 2013/01/07
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qdev: obey no_user, Anthony Liguori, 2013/01/07
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qdev: obey no_user, Peter Maydell, 2013/01/07
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qdev: obey no_user, Anthony Liguori, 2013/01/07
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qdev: obey no_user, Andreas Färber, 2013/01/07
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qdev: obey no_user,
Peter Maydell <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qdev: obey no_user, Andreas Färber, 2013/01/07
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qdev: obey no_user, Anthony Liguori, 2013/01/07
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qdev: obey no_user, Christian Borntraeger, 2013/01/07