qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V3 2/4] HMP: add infrastructure for sub command


From: wenchao xia
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V3 2/4] HMP: add infrastructure for sub command
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 15:07:51 +0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0

于 2013-1-10 11:30, Wenchao Xia 写道:
-static const mon_cmd_t *qmp_find_cmd(const char *cmdname)
-{
-    return search_dispatch_table(qmp_cmds, cmdname);
-}

Touching qmp_find_cmd() is unrelated to this series.

   OK.

-
-static const mon_cmd_t *monitor_parse_command(Monitor *mon,
-                                              const char *cmdline,
-                                              QDict *qdict)
+/*
+ * Try find the target mon_cmd_t instance, if it have sub_table and
have string
+ * for it, this function will try search it with remain string, and
if not
+ * found it return NULL.
+ */
+static const mon_cmd_t *hmp_parse_command(Monitor *mon,
+                                          const char *cmdline,
+                                          mon_cmd_t *table,
+                                          QDict *qdict)

Renaming is also not necessary, but if you do it please do in a different
patch.

   OK.

  {
+        }
+        return hmp_parse_command(mon, p, cmd->sub_table, qdict);

This works, and seems less hack then the previous attempt.

Except for a small detail. This:

   (qemu) info bla

Currently returns a list of info commands, but with this series it
returns
an error.

   Yep, I think command completion is another topic, but I am pretty
sure it can be solved in this framework, for that it is not hack and
what need to do is, let command completion function knows there may be
another sub layer too.

  Sorry I missed your point. Returning an error instead of info
commands, is made on purpose. IMHO always print the commands
make user confused, message tipping what is wrong is better.

I'd like to get a reviewed-by from Markus before applying this as,
besides
this being his idea, I honestly have a very hard time knowing how to
move old
hmp hackery forward.






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]