qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC qom-cpu 03/15] target-i386: Update CPU to QOM real


From: Andreas Färber
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC qom-cpu 03/15] target-i386: Update CPU to QOM realizefn
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 23:52:47 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130105 Thunderbird/17.0.2

Am 16.01.2013 17:04, schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 06:32:48AM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
> [...]
>> @@ -2247,6 +2247,9 @@ static void x86_cpu_common_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, 
>> void *data)
>>  {
>>      X86CPUClass *xcc = X86_CPU_CLASS(oc);
>>      CPUClass *cc = CPU_CLASS(oc);
>> +    DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(oc);
>> +
>> +    dc->realize = x86_cpu_realizefn;
> 
> The DeviceClass documenation says:
> 
> "Any type may override the @realize and/or @unrealize callbacks but
> needs to call (and thus save) the parent type's implementation if so
> desired."
> 
> Why are you not following it?

"if so desired" - I didn't desire or need to call code that calls an
initfn that no longer exists after this patch. Same as the ISADevice
conversion series did not unnecessarily call the DeviceClass-level
backwards-compatibility realizefn: to save time-consuming
...Class::parent_realizefn field additions and to not in the end call
code that doesn't NULL-check ...DeviceClass::init. That's qdev's old
"leaf type" concept mentioned in the same documentation.

I mentioned in the cover letter that this needs to be changed once a
CPUClass-level realizefn is introduced. I could introduce a no-op
realizefn there and do the regular store+call.

Note that wherever we set realized = true on CPUs, we need to test and
re-review for further unchecked uses of parent_bus. It has been pushed
to qom-cpu-realize branch for anyone that wants to play with the latest
version.

Andreas

-- 
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]