qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 1/2] qbus_find_recursive(): don't abort search for


From: KONRAD Frédéric
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 1/2] qbus_find_recursive(): don't abort search for named bus on full bus node
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 16:58:24 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130110 Thunderbird/17.0.2

On 31/01/2013 16:52, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 31 January 2013 15:42, Laszlo Ersek <address@hidden> wrote:
The bus we're looking for could be in the sub-tree rooted at the node
being checked; don't skip looping over the children.

Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <address@hidden>
---
  hw/qdev-monitor.c |   10 +--------
  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/qdev-monitor.c b/hw/qdev-monitor.c
index 4e2a92b..34f5014 100644
--- a/hw/qdev-monitor.c
+++ b/hw/qdev-monitor.c
@@ -295,15 +295,7 @@ static BusState *qbus_find_recursive(BusState *bus, const 
char *name,
          match = 0;
      }
      if ((bus_class->max_dev != 0) && (bus_class->max_dev <= bus->max_index)) {
-        if (name != NULL) {
-            /* bus was explicitly specified: return an error. */
-            qerror_report(ERROR_CLASS_GENERIC_ERROR, "Bus '%s' is full",
-                          bus->name);
-            return NULL;
-        } else {
-            /* bus was not specified: try to find another one. */
-            match = 0;
-        }
+        match = 0;
      }
This looks like the wrong fix to this problem -- if the user passed
us a specific name to search for and we found it and it was full, then
we definitely want to stop here. On the other hand, if the user passed
us a specific name and this bus isn't that named bus then we shouldn't
be checking the max_index at all.

So I think the right fix is that the condition should be
   if (match && (bus_class->max_dev != 0)
       && (bus_class->max_dev <= bus->max_index)) {

and the rest of the code in this function stays as is.

-- PMM
The final result looks the same no?

If you look the qdev-monitor.c code just above the patch, you'll find the same thing:

    if (name && (strcmp(bus->name, name) != 0)) {
        match = 0;
    }
    if (bus_typename && !object_dynamic_cast(OBJECT(bus), bus_typename)) {
        match = 0;
    }
if ((bus_class->max_dev != 0) && (bus_class->max_dev <= bus->max_index)) {
        ...

Fred




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]