[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC migration of zero pages
From: |
Avi Kivity |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC migration of zero pages |
Date: |
Thu, 31 Jan 2013 16:36:25 +0200 |
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Gleb Natapov <address@hidden> wrote:
>> >
>> > Avi/Michael do you remember why mincore can't be used to check if a guest
>> page is unmapped?
>>
>> A page may be not in core, but also nonzero (for example swap).
> Yes, mincore() should not be used as zero page check, but it can be used
> as an indicator that page can be dealt with in dead stage of migration
> since it is likely zero and will not take much time to send.
Or it's swapped, in which case we know nothing about it.
> It is
> possible to call madvise(MADV_WILLNEED) on them meanwhile to pre-load
> swap without faulting on each page individually.
During migration you're faulting like mad anyway.
- Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC migration of zero pages, (continued)
Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC migration of zero pages, Gleb Natapov, 2013/01/31
Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC migration of zero pages, Gleb Natapov, 2013/01/31
Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC migration of zero pages,
Avi Kivity <=
Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC migration of zero pages, Gleb Natapov, 2013/01/31
Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC migration of zero pages, Avi Kivity, 2013/01/31
Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC migration of zero pages, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2013/01/31
Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC migration of zero pages, Michael R. hines, 2013/01/31