Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] bitops: unify bitops_flsl with host-utils.h, call it bitops_clzl

[Richard Henderson]

On 2013-02-04 10:34, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > -       }
> > +    /* Both this function and the gcc builtin are undefined at 0, whereas
> > +       the host-utils functions return word-size at 0.  Thus we prefer the
> > +       gcc builtin as the closer match.  */
>
> I think we should just fix the inconsistency rather than
> retaining several similarly-named functions which have differing
> corner-case behaviour.

As opposed to bitops_ctzl (-1) and host-utils ctzN (N) ?


r~