qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 02/13] qdev: change first argument of qbus_cr


From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 02/13] qdev: change first argument of qbus_create_inplace to void *
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 07:20:26 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130110 Thunderbird/17.0.2

Il 25/01/2013 15:04, Andreas Färber ha scritto:
> Am 25.01.2013 14:12, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
>> Make it clear that no BUS() macro is needed in the callers (in fact it
>> wouldn't work because the object has not been initialized yet with the
>> right class).
>>
>> Suggested-by: Andreas Faerber <address@hidden>
>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>
> 
> Acked-by: Andreas Färber <address@hidden>
> 
> But we should adjust most current callers then:
> 
> hw/ide/qdev.c:    qbus_create_inplace(&idebus->qbus, TYPE_IDE_BUS, dev,
> NULL);
> 
> ..._inplace(idebus, ...)
> 
> hw/intel-hda.c:    qbus_create_inplace(&bus->qbus, TYPE_HDA_BUS, dev, NULL);
> hw/ipack.c:    qbus_create_inplace(&bus->qbus, TYPE_IPACK_BUS, parent,
> name);
> hw/pci/pci.c:    qbus_create_inplace(&bus->qbus, TYPE_PCI_BUS, parent,
> name);
> hw/pci/pci_bridge.c:    qbus_create_inplace(&sec_bus->qbus,
> TYPE_PCI_BUS, &dev->qdev,
> hw/s390-virtio-bus.c:    qbus_create_inplace((BusState *)bus,
> TYPE_VIRTIO_S390_BUS, qdev, NULL);
> 
> ..._inplace(bus, ...)
> 
> hw/s390x/event-facility.c:
> qbus_create_inplace(&event_facility->sbus.qbus,
> hw/scsi-bus.c:    qbus_create_inplace(&bus->qbus, TYPE_SCSI_BUS, host,
> NULL);
> hw/usb/bus.c:    qbus_create_inplace(&bus->qbus, TYPE_USB_BUS, host, NULL);
> hw/usb/dev-smartcard-reader.c:    qbus_create_inplace(&s->bus.qbus,
> TYPE_CCID_BUS, &dev->qdev, NULL);
> hw/virtio-pci.c:    qbus_create_inplace((BusState *)bus,
> TYPE_VIRTIO_PCI_BUS, qdev, NULL);
> hw/virtio-serial-bus.c:    qbus_create_inplace(&vser->bus.qbus,
> TYPE_VIRTIO_SERIAL_BUS, dev, NULL);
> 
> Should I send a follow-up patch for that or do you want to squash it
> into yours to show the utility of your change?

Sorry, I missed this message.  I'll send a follow-up for 1.5.

Paolo




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]