qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] ui/gtk: require at least GTK 2.18 and VTE 0.


From: Markus Armbruster
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] ui/gtk: require at least GTK 2.18 and VTE 0.26
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 19:12:36 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux)

Stefan Weil <address@hidden> writes:

> Am 22.02.2013 18:04, schrieb Markus Armbruster:
>> Anthony Liguori <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> Stefan Weil <address@hidden> writes:
>>>
>>>> Am 22.02.2013 16:50, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
>>>>> This gives us the bare amount of features we need.  We can add work 
>>>>> arounds
>>>>> for older versions and lower the requirement but this should be a good
>>>>> starting point.
>>>>>
>>>>> Suggested-by: Daniel Berrange <address@hidden>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <address@hidden>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> v1 -> v2
>>>>>  - tremendous simplification suggested by danpb
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  configure | 4 ++--
>>>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/configure b/configure
>>>>> index 0dadd31..0eb25dd 100755
>>>>> --- a/configure
>>>>> +++ b/configure
>>>>> @@ -1644,8 +1644,8 @@ fi
>>>>>  # GTK probe
>>>>>  
>>>>>  if test "$gtk" != "no"; then
>>>>> -    if $pkg_config gtk+-2.0 --modversion >/dev/null 2>/dev/null && \
>>>>> -       $pkg_config vte --modversion >/dev/null 2>/dev/null; then
>>>>> +    if $pkg_config --exists 'gtk+-2.0 >= 2.18.0' && \
>>>>> +       $pkg_config --exists 'vte >= 0.26.0'; then
>>>> It's even possible to combine both checks in one :-)
>>>>
>>>> --exists 'gtk+-2.0 >= 2.18.0 vte >= 0.26.0'
>>>>
>>>> But we need a different solution because not all platforms
>>>> support VTE. It must be possible to use GTK without VTE,
>>>> so VTE needs its own section in configure.
>>> As I mentioned eariler, the "other platforms" should start looking at
>>> supporting VTE.
>>>
>>> Rolling our own terminal emulation is not reasonable.
>> Agreed.  There's always VNC, even on "other platforms".
>
> Did I miss something? VNC is not a terminal emulation.

I meant VNC for the guest's screen + suitable character devices for
monitors.  Too terse again, sorry.

[...]



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]