qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] How many msi-x vectors should be allocated for the virt


From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] How many msi-x vectors should be allocated for the virtio-serial device?
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 14:47:11 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130110 Thunderbird/17.0.2

Il 27/02/2013 14:46, Gal Hammer ha scritto:
> On 27/02/2013 15:28, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 27/02/2013 14:24, Gal Hammer ha scritto:
>>> On 27/02/2013 14:35, Amit Shah wrote:
>>>> On (Mon) 04 Feb 2013 [11:59:02], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 10:42:32AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>>>> Il 03/02/2013 13:11, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
>>>>>>>>>    static Property virtio_serial_properties[] = {
>>>>>>>>>        DEFINE_PROP_BIT("ioeventfd", VirtIOPCIProxy, flags,
>>>>>>>>> VIRTIO_PCI_FLAG_USE_IOEVENTFD_BIT, true),
>>>>>>>>> -    DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("vectors", VirtIOPCIProxy, nvectors,
>>>>>>>>> DEV_NVECTORS_UNSPECIFIED),
>>>>>>>>> +    DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("vectors", VirtIOPCIProxy, nvectors, 2),
>>>>>>>>>        DEFINE_PROP_HEX32("class", VirtIOPCIProxy, class_code, 0),
>>>>>>>>>        DEFINE_VIRTIO_COMMON_FEATURES(VirtIOPCIProxy,
>>>>>>>>> host_features),
>>>>>>>>>        DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("max_ports", VirtIOPCIProxy,
>>>>>>>>> serial.max_virtserial_ports, 31),
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> plus the backwards-compatibility stuff.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Paolo
>>>>>>> Makes sense, but the logic in virtio_serial_init_pci is
>>>>>>> then dead code and should go away.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It won't be dead code for the backwards-compatible machine types
>>>>>> (that
>>>>>> use DEV_NVECTORS_UNSPECIFIED).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Paolo
>>>>>
>>>>> Good point. Ack. Want to post this with proper signature etc?
>>>>
>>>> Gal, do you want to submit a patch for this?
>>>>
>>>>          Amit
>>>>
>>>
>>> Attached.
>>
>> You need to add backwards-compatibility properties in hw/pc.h.
> 
> I've added the BC property. I hope it is in the right format.

Yes, it's okay though usually we send patches with git-send-email.  It's
up to mst whether to take the attached patch or not. :)

Anyhow,

Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>

Thanks!

Paolo



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]