qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH] coroutine: use AioContext for CoQueue BH


From: Stefan Hajnoczi
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] coroutine: use AioContext for CoQueue BH
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 15:53:23 +0100

CoQueue uses a BH to awake coroutines that were made ready to run again
using qemu_co_queue_next() or qemu_co_queue_restart_all().  The BH
currently runs in the iothread AioContext and would break coroutines
that run in a different AioContext.

This is a slightly tricky problem because the lifetime of the BH exceeds
that of the CoQueue.  This means coroutines can be awoken after CoQueue
itself has been freed.  Also, there is no qemu_co_queue_destroy()
function which we could use to handle freeing resources.

Introducing qemu_co_queue_destroy() has a ripple effect of requiring us
to also add qemu_co_mutex_destroy() and qemu_co_rwlock_destroy(), as
well as updating all callers.  Avoid doing that.

We also cannot switch from BH to GIdle function because aio_poll() does
not dispatch GIdle functions.  (GIdle functions make memory management
slightly easier because they free themselves.)

Finally, I don't want to move unlock_queue and unlock_bh into
AioContext.  That would break encapsulation - AioContext isn't supposed
to know about CoQueue.

This patch implements a different solution: each qemu_co_queue_next() or
qemu_co_queue_restart_all() call creates a new BH and list of coroutines
to wake up.  Callers tend to invoke qemu_co_queue_next() and
qemu_co_queue_restart_all() occasionally after blocking I/O, so creating
a new BH for each call shouldn't be massively inefficient.

Note that this patch does not add an interface for specifying the
AioContext.  That is left to future patches which will convert CoQueue,
CoMutex, and CoRwlock to expose AioContext.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <address@hidden>
---
 include/block/coroutine.h |  1 +
 qemu-coroutine-lock.c     | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/block/coroutine.h b/include/block/coroutine.h
index c31fae3..a978162 100644
--- a/include/block/coroutine.h
+++ b/include/block/coroutine.h
@@ -104,6 +104,7 @@ bool qemu_in_coroutine(void);
  */
 typedef struct CoQueue {
     QTAILQ_HEAD(, Coroutine) entries;
+    AioContext *ctx;
 } CoQueue;
 
 /**
diff --git a/qemu-coroutine-lock.c b/qemu-coroutine-lock.c
index 97ef01c..ae986b3 100644
--- a/qemu-coroutine-lock.c
+++ b/qemu-coroutine-lock.c
@@ -29,28 +29,34 @@
 #include "block/aio.h"
 #include "trace.h"
 
-static QTAILQ_HEAD(, Coroutine) unlock_bh_queue =
-    QTAILQ_HEAD_INITIALIZER(unlock_bh_queue);
-static QEMUBH* unlock_bh;
+/* Coroutines are awoken from a BH to allow the current coroutine to complete
+ * its flow of execution.  The BH may run after the CoQueue has been destroyed,
+ * so keep BH data in a separate heap-allocated struct.
+ */
+typedef struct {
+    QEMUBH *bh;
+    QTAILQ_HEAD(, Coroutine) entries;
+} CoQueueNextData;
 
 static void qemu_co_queue_next_bh(void *opaque)
 {
+    CoQueueNextData *data = opaque;
     Coroutine *next;
 
     trace_qemu_co_queue_next_bh();
-    while ((next = QTAILQ_FIRST(&unlock_bh_queue))) {
-        QTAILQ_REMOVE(&unlock_bh_queue, next, co_queue_next);
+    while ((next = QTAILQ_FIRST(&data->entries))) {
+        QTAILQ_REMOVE(&data->entries, next, co_queue_next);
         qemu_coroutine_enter(next, NULL);
     }
+
+    qemu_bh_delete(data->bh);
+    g_slice_free(CoQueueNextData, data);
 }
 
 void qemu_co_queue_init(CoQueue *queue)
 {
     QTAILQ_INIT(&queue->entries);
-
-    if (!unlock_bh) {
-        unlock_bh = qemu_bh_new(qemu_co_queue_next_bh, NULL);
-    }
+    queue->ctx = NULL;
 }
 
 void coroutine_fn qemu_co_queue_wait(CoQueue *queue)
@@ -69,26 +75,43 @@ void coroutine_fn qemu_co_queue_wait_insert_head(CoQueue 
*queue)
     assert(qemu_in_coroutine());
 }
 
-bool qemu_co_queue_next(CoQueue *queue)
+static bool qemu_co_queue_do_restart(CoQueue *queue, bool single)
 {
     Coroutine *next;
+    CoQueueNextData *data;
+
+    if (QTAILQ_EMPTY(&queue->entries)) {
+        return false;
+    }
 
-    next = QTAILQ_FIRST(&queue->entries);
-    if (next) {
+    data = g_slice_new(CoQueueNextData);
+    if (queue->ctx) {
+        data->bh = aio_bh_new(queue->ctx, qemu_co_queue_next_bh, data);
+    } else {
+        data->bh = qemu_bh_new(qemu_co_queue_next_bh, data);
+    }
+    QTAILQ_INIT(&data->entries);
+    qemu_bh_schedule(data->bh);
+
+    while ((next = QTAILQ_FIRST(&queue->entries)) != NULL) {
         QTAILQ_REMOVE(&queue->entries, next, co_queue_next);
-        QTAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&unlock_bh_queue, next, co_queue_next);
+        QTAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&data->entries, next, co_queue_next);
         trace_qemu_co_queue_next(next);
-        qemu_bh_schedule(unlock_bh);
+        if (single) {
+            break;
+        }
     }
+    return true;
+}
 
-    return (next != NULL);
+bool qemu_co_queue_next(CoQueue *queue)
+{
+    return qemu_co_queue_do_restart(queue, true);
 }
 
 void qemu_co_queue_restart_all(CoQueue *queue)
 {
-    while (qemu_co_queue_next(queue)) {
-        /* Do nothing */
-    }
+    qemu_co_queue_do_restart(queue, false);
 }
 
 bool qemu_co_queue_empty(CoQueue *queue)
-- 
1.8.1.4




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]