qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH RDMA support v4: 03/10] more verbose documen


From: Michael R. Hines
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH RDMA support v4: 03/10] more verbose documentation of the RDMA transport
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 11:22:36 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2

s / is page mapped?/ is page unmapped?/ g


On 03/20/2013 11:15 AM, Michael R. Hines wrote:
OK, can we make a deal? =)

I'm willing to put in the work to perform the dynamic registration on the destination side,
but let's go a step further and piggy-back on the effort:

We need to couple this registration with a very small modification to save_ram_block():

Currently, save_ram_block does:

1. is RDMA turned on?      if yes, unconditionally add to next chunk
(will be made to dynamically register on destination)
2. is_dup_page() ?            if yes, skip
3. in xbzrle cache?           if yes, skip
4. still not sent?                if yes, transmit

I propose adding a "stub" function that adds:

0. is page mapped?         if yes, skip   (always returns true for now)
1. same
2. same
3. same
4. same

Then, later, in a separate patch, I can implement /dev/pagemap support.

When that's done, RDMA dynamic registration will actually take effect and
benefit from actually verifying that the page is mapped or not.

- Michael


On 03/20/2013 09:07 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
My problem is with the protocol. If it assumes at the protocol level that everything is pinned down on the destination, we'll have to rework it all to make it really useful.






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]