qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC ppc-next PATCH 5/6] kvm: export result of irqchip


From: Alexander Graf
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC ppc-next PATCH 5/6] kvm: export result of irqchip config check
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 09:34:55 +0100

On 14.02.2013, at 07:32, Scott Wood wrote:

> This allows platform code to register in-kernel irqchips that
> don't use the legacy KVM_CAP_IRQCHIP/KVM_CREATE_IRQCHIP interface.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <address@hidden>
> ---
> include/sysemu/kvm.h |   10 ++++++++++
> kvm-all.c            |   11 +++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/sysemu/kvm.h b/include/sysemu/kvm.h
> index f2d97b5..b9a8701 100644
> --- a/include/sysemu/kvm.h
> +++ b/include/sysemu/kvm.h
> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ extern bool kvm_async_interrupts_allowed;
> extern bool kvm_irqfds_allowed;
> extern bool kvm_msi_via_irqfd_allowed;
> extern bool kvm_gsi_routing_allowed;
> +extern bool kvm_irqchip_wanted;
> 
> #if defined CONFIG_KVM || !defined NEED_CPU_H
> #define kvm_enabled()           (kvm_allowed)
> @@ -97,6 +98,14 @@ extern bool kvm_gsi_routing_allowed;
>  */
> #define kvm_gsi_routing_enabled() (kvm_gsi_routing_allowed)
> 
> +/**
> + * kvm_irqchip_wanted
> + *
> + * Returns: true if the user requested that an in-kernel IRQ chip be
> + * used, regardless of whether support has been detected.
> + */
> +#define kvm_irqchip_wanted() (kvm_irqchip_wanted)
> +
> #else
> #define kvm_enabled()           (0)
> #define kvm_irqchip_in_kernel() (false)
> @@ -104,6 +113,7 @@ extern bool kvm_gsi_routing_allowed;
> #define kvm_irqfds_enabled() (false)
> #define kvm_msi_via_irqfd_enabled() (false)
> #define kvm_gsi_routing_allowed() (false)
> +#define kvm_irqchip_wanted() (false)
> #endif
> 
> struct kvm_run;
> diff --git a/kvm-all.c b/kvm-all.c
> index 04ec2d5..13a628d 100644
> --- a/kvm-all.c
> +++ b/kvm-all.c
> @@ -109,6 +109,7 @@ bool kvm_async_interrupts_allowed;
> bool kvm_irqfds_allowed;
> bool kvm_msi_via_irqfd_allowed;
> bool kvm_gsi_routing_allowed;
> +bool kvm_irqchip_wanted;
> 
> static const KVMCapabilityInfo kvm_required_capabilites[] = {
>     KVM_CAP_INFO(USER_MEMORY),
> @@ -1205,8 +1206,14 @@ static int kvm_irqchip_create(KVMState *s)
> 
>     if (QTAILQ_EMPTY(&list->head) ||
>         !qemu_opt_get_bool(QTAILQ_FIRST(&list->head),
> -                           "kernel_irqchip", true) ||
> -        !kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_IRQCHIP)) {
> +                           "kernel_irqchip", true)) {
> +        return 0;
> +    }
> +
> +    kvm_irqchip_wanted = true;
> +
> +    /* Platform code may have a different way of enabling an IRQ chip */
> +    if (!kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_IRQCHIP)) {

Does x86 have the required checks then to make sure it has the CAP?


Alex

>         return 0;
>     }
> 
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5
> 
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]