Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] memory: reverse the priority when commit

[Peter Maydell]

On 28 March 2013 08:08, Liu Ping Fan <address@hidden> wrote:
> In theroy, the high priority should commit earlier, it is the same
> reason as the sequence of "Lower = earlier (during add), later (during del)"

Hi. Could you give a bit more detail about the reason for this
change, please? Do any of our existing commit hooks currently
care about the order in which they're called (ie is this fixing
a bug), or is there some use case that would care in future?

This change may well be right but it's not immediately obvious
that begin/commit are a paired set in the same way as (say)
add/del and log_start/log_stop, so more rationale would be
helpful.

thanks
-- PMM