qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] New cpu-max field in query-machines QMP comm


From: Luiz Capitulino
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] New cpu-max field in query-machines QMP command output
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 09:06:13 -0400

On Mon, 08 Apr 2013 11:14:32 -0600
Eric Blake <address@hidden> wrote:

> On 04/08/2013 10:41 AM, Michal Novotny wrote:
> > Alter the query-machines QMP command to output information about
> > maximum number of CPUs for each machine type with default value
> > set to 1 in case the number of max_cpus is not set.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Novotny <address@hidden>
> > ---
> >  qapi-schema.json | 4 +++-
> >  vl.c             | 1 +
> >  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/qapi-schema.json b/qapi-schema.json
> > index db542f6..689ca8d 100644
> > --- a/qapi-schema.json
> > +++ b/qapi-schema.json
> > @@ -2861,11 +2861,13 @@
> >  #
> >  # @default: #optional whether the machine is default
> >  #
> > +# @cpu-max: maximum number of CPUs supported by the machine type
> 
> Typically, when adding a field in a later version than the original
> introduction of the datatype, we add '(since 1.5)' to make it obvious
> when to expect the field.  However, as nothing (currently) enforces this
> rule, I think such an addition is minor enough that it wouldn't
> invalidate the use of my:

Oh, it turns out I was making some confusion with this patch and
didn't realize it was extending the query-machines command.

I don't mean there's anything wrong with it, but my question is: doesn't
this patch invalidates query-cpu-max?

PS: I can add the '(since 1.5)' line myself.

> 
> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <address@hidden>
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]